Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use

被引:96
|
作者
Dale, Virginia H. [1 ]
Kline, Keith L. [1 ]
Wright, Lynn L. [1 ]
Perlack, Robert D. [1 ]
Downing, Mark [1 ]
Graham, Robin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
关键词
bioenergy feedstocks; biomass production; carbon sequestration; hypoxia; indicators; landscape design; land use; scale; sustainability; trade-offs; UNITED-STATES; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; CARBON STORAGE; COVER CHANGE; CORN STOVER; BIOMASS; ENERGY; BIOFUELS; SWITCHGRASS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1890/09-0501.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Landscape implications of bioenergy feedstock choices are significant and depend on land-use practices and their environmental impacts. Although land-use changes and carbon emissions associated with bioenergy feedstock production are dynamic and complicated, lignocellulosic feedstocks may offer opportunities that enhance sustainability when compared to other transportation fuel alternatives. For bioenergy sustainability, major drivers and concerns revolve around energy security, food production, land productivity, soil carbon and erosion, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, air quality, and water quantity and quality. The many implications of bioenergy feedstock choices require several indicators at multiple scales to provide a more complete accounting of effects. Ultimately, the long-term sustainability of bioenergy feedstock resources (as well as food supplies) throughout the world depends on land-use practices and landscape dynamics. Land-management decisions often invoke trade-offs among potential environmental effects and social and economic factors as well as future opportunities for resource use. The hypothesis being addressed in this paper is that sustainability of bioenergy feedstock production can be achieved via appropriately designed crop residue and perennial lignocellulosic systems. We find that decision makers need scientific advancements and adequate data that both provide quantitative and qualitative measures of the effects of bioenergy feedstock choices at different spatial and temporal scales and allow fair comparisons among available options for renewable liquid fuels.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1054
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production Potential by Integrated Geospatial Analysis of Land Use and Land Quality
    Wightman, Jenifer L.
    Ahmed, Zia U.
    Volk, Timothy A.
    Castellano, Philip J.
    Peters, Christian J.
    DeGloria, Stephen D.
    Duxbury, John M.
    Woodbury, Peter B.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (04) : 1671 - 1680
  • [2] Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition
    Graves, Rose A.
    Pearson, Scott M.
    Turner, Monica G.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (02) : 515 - 529
  • [3] Assessing Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production Potential by Integrated Geospatial Analysis of Land Use and Land Quality
    Jenifer L. Wightman
    Zia U. Ahmed
    Timothy A. Volk
    Philip J. Castellano
    Christian J. Peters
    Stephen D. DeGloria
    John M. Duxbury
    Peter B. Woodbury
    BioEnergy Research, 2015, 8 : 1671 - 1680
  • [4] Effect of land use change for bioenergy production on feedstock cost and water quality
    Zhong, Jia
    Yu, T. Edward
    Clark, Christopher D.
    English, Burton C.
    Larson, James A.
    Cheng, Chu-Lin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 210 : 580 - 590
  • [5] Biomass and bioenergy in the wider land-use context of the European Union
    Allen, Benjamin R.
    Keegan, Dearbhla
    Elbersen, Berien
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2013, 7 (02): : 207 - 216
  • [6] Implications of land class and environmental factors on life cycle GHG emissions of Miscanthus as a bioenergy feedstock
    Sanscartier, David
    Deen, Bill
    Dias, Goretty
    MacLean, Heather L.
    Dadfar, Humaira
    McDonald, Ian
    Kludze, Hilla
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2014, 6 (04): : 401 - 413
  • [7] Compositional differences among upland and lowland switchgrass ecotypes grown as a bioenergy feedstock crop
    Aurangzaib, Muhammad
    Moore, Kenneth J.
    Archontoulis, Sotirios V.
    Heaton, Emily A.
    Lenssen, Andrew W.
    Fei, Shuizhang
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 87 : 169 - 177
  • [8] LAND USE CHANGES AND BIOENERGY IN LATVIA
    Melece, Ligita
    Lakovskis, Peteris
    ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT: PRODUCTION AND CO-OPERATION IN AGRICULTURE, 2014, (34): : 180 - 188
  • [9] Impacts of a 32-billion-gallon bioenergy landscape on land and fossil fuel use in the US
    Hudiburg, Tara W.
    Wang, WeiWei
    Khanna, Madhu
    Long, Stephen P.
    Dwivedi, Puneet
    Parton, William J.
    Hartman, Melannie
    DeLucia, Evan H.
    NATURE ENERGY, 2016, 1
  • [10] Bioenergy and Land Use: Framing the Ethical Debate
    Gamborg, C.
    Millar, K.
    Shortall, O.
    Sandoe, P.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2012, 25 (06) : 909 - 925