Rate of postdates induction using first-trimester ultrasound to determine estimated due date: Wellington Regional Hospital audit

被引:3
作者
Tun, May [1 ]
Tuohy, Jeremy [1 ]
机构
[1] Wellington Publ Hosp, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
delivery; first-trimester ultrasound; gestational age; postterm; postdates induction; pregnancy; LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD;
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01279.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this audit was to examine the effect of using first-trimester (< 14 weeks) ultrasound scan to determine EDD (US EDD) on the rate of induction for postdates pregnancies at Wellington Regional Hospital. Methods: Women with singleton live pregnancies who had postdates (>= 41 weeks) induction at Wellington Hospital during January 2009 to November 2009 were identified using a computerised database [Perinatal Information Management System (PIMS)]. The first-trimester ultrasound images and reports for these women were retrieved and reviewed by a specialist in obstetric ultrasound. Only ultrasound studies that had technically satisfactory images at < 14 weeks were included. Results: A total of 329 women with a singleton live pregnancy were induced for postdates during the study period. Of these women, 50 (15.2%) were not >= 41 weeks on PIMS EDD and therefore on the best available evidence should not have been induced for being postdates. Of the remaining 279 women, 158 had first-trimester scans available for review. Forty-three of 158 (27%) were < 41 weeks when US EDD was used. Conclusions: The rate of postdates inductions at Wellington NRH could be decreased by 38% if induction was limited to women over 41-week gestation and by using US EDD as opposed to last menstrual period EDD. The use of early gestational scans (< 14 weeks) to estimate EDD lowers the rate of postdates induction. This is very similar to the observed findings in literature.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 219
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] *ASUM, POL STAT D7 STAT NOR, P3521
  • [2] First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: A randomized controlled trial
    Bennett, KA
    Crane, JMG
    O'Shea, P
    Lacelle, J
    Hutchens, D
    Copel, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (04) : 1077 - 1081
  • [3] Blondel A, 2002, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V109, P718
  • [4] CAUGHEY AB, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V198
  • [5] Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term
    Guelmezoglu, A. M.
    Crowther, C. A.
    Middleton, P.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):
  • [6] Neilson J P, 1998, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000182, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000182]
  • [7] Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination
    Savitz, DA
    Terry, JW
    Dole, N
    Thorp, JM
    Siega-Riz, AM
    Herring, AH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (06) : 1660 - 1666
  • [8] Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation
    Taipale, P
    Hiilesmaa, V
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02) : 189 - 194
  • [9] The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study
    Wilcox, AJ
    Dunson, D
    Baird, DD
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7271) : 1259 - 1262