Kernel Evolving Participatory Fuzzy Modeling for Time Series Forecasting: New Perspectives Based on Distance Measures

被引:1
作者
de Oliveira Marques, Eduardo Santos [1 ]
Rocha Alves, Kaike Sa Teles [2 ]
Pekaslan, Direnc [3 ]
de Aguiar, Eduardo Pestana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora, Ind & Mech Engn Dept, Juiz De Fora, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora, Grad Program Computat Modeling, Juiz De Fora, Brazil
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Comp Sci, Nottingham, England
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE) | 2022年
关键词
Time series forecasting; evolving Fuzzy Systems; Chaotic time series; PREDICTION; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE55066.2022.9882602
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The evolving Fuzzy Systems (eFSs) has demonstrated a powerful class of model for time series forecasting, due to their autonomy to handle with the data, and with highly complex problems in real-world applications. Unfortunately, real-world data contains sources of perturbations and variations that can be correlated to external variables, known as randomness. An alternative cause of randomness is chaos, forming the chaotic time series. This paper suggests the ePL-KRLS-FSM, a new class of evolving fuzzy modeling approach that combines participatory learning (PL), a kernel recursive least squares method (KRLS), and data transformation into fuzzy sets (FSs). This transformation allows better handling of inaccuracies with the data, proposing a model that can predict chaotic data with more exactness. The model is evaluated using nonlinear dynamic system and the main stock index of the TAIEX. Furthermore, the performance of the ePL-KRLS-FSM is compared with some related state-of-the-art rule-based eFSs and traditional forecasting models. The computational results show that the proposed model is competitive and performs more consistently than the compared models.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]  
Maciel L, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 EVOLVING AND ADAPTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (EAIS)
[22]   Algorithmic randomness in empirical data [J].
McAllister, JW .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2003, 34A (03) :633-646
[23]  
McCulloch J., 2017, BITBUCKET MEASURES P
[24]  
McCulloch JC, 2016, Novel methods of measuring the similarity and distance between complex fuzzy sets
[25]  
McCulloch J, 2017, IEEE INT CONF FUZZY
[26]  
Oliveto P.S., 2011, Theory of Randomized Search Heuristics: Foundations and Recent Developments, P21, DOI 10.1142/9789814282673_0002
[27]   ADONiS-Adaptive Online Nonsingleton Fuzzy Logic Systems [J].
Pekaslan, Direnc ;
Wagner, Christian ;
Garibaldi, Jonathan M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 28 (10) :2302-2312
[28]  
Pinto A.M., 2021, OCEANS 2021: San DiegoPorto, San Diego, CA, USA, P1, DOI [10.23919/OCEANS44145.2021.9706059, DOI 10.23919/OCEANS44145.2021.9706059]
[29]   PROBABILITY AND FUZZINESS [J].
RALESCU, AL ;
RALESCU, DA .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1984, 34 (02) :85-92
[30]   An integrated framework of genetic network programming and multi-layer perceptron neural network for prediction of daily stock return: An application in Tehran stock exchange market [J].
Ramezanian, Reza ;
Peymanfar, Arsalan ;
Ebrahimi, Seyed Babak .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 82