Decision-making for risk evaluation: integration of prospect theory with failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)

被引:22
作者
Sagnak, Muhittin [1 ]
Kazancoglu, Yigit [2 ]
Ozen, Yesim Deniz Ozkan [2 ]
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo [3 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Informat & Document Management, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Yasar Univ, Dept Int Logist Management, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Derby, Sch Technol, Derby, England
关键词
Prospect theory; Failure modes and effects analysis; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TODIM; Risk priority number; TOPSIS APPROACH; FUZZY; TODIM; AHP; PRIORITIZATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-01-2020-0013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of the present study is to overcome some of the limitations of the FMEA method by presenting a theoretical base for considering risk evaluation into its assessment methodology and proposing an approach for its implementation. Design/methodology/approach Fuzzy AHP is used to calculate the weights of the likelihood of occurrence (O), severity (S) and difficulty of detection (D). Additionally, the prospect-theory-based TODIM method was integrated with fuzzy logic. Thus, fuzzy TODIM was employed to calculate the ranking of potential failure modes according to their risk priority numbers (RPNs). In order to verify the results of the study, in-depth interviews were conducted with the participation of industry experts. Findings The results are very much in line with prospect theory. Therefore, practitioners may apply the proposed method to FMEA. The most crucial failure mode for a firm's attention is furnace failure followed by generator failure, crane failure, tank failure, kettle failure, dryer failure and operator failure, respectively. Originality/value The originality of this paper consists in integrating prospect theory with the FMEA method in order to overcome the limitations naturally inherent in the calculation of the FMEA's RPNs.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 956
页数:18
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]  
Sankar N.R., 2001, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V18, P324, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710110383737
[42]   Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling [J].
Sharma, Rajiv ;
Kumar, Dinesh ;
Kumar, Pradeep .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2005, 22 (09) :986-+
[43]   A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments [J].
Song, Wenyan ;
Ming, Xinguo ;
Wu, Zhenyong ;
Zhu, Baoting .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 30 (04) :473-486
[44]  
Stamatis D.H., 1995, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis FMEA from Theory to Execution ASQC
[45]  
Teng S.-H.G., 1996, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V13, P8, DOI [10.1108/02656719610118151, DOI 10.1108/02656719610118151]
[46]   Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty [J].
Tseng, Ming-Lang ;
Lin, Yuan-Hsu ;
Tan, Kimhua ;
Chen, Rong-Hui ;
Chen, Yuan-Ho .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2014, 38 (11-12) :2983-2995
[47]   A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process [J].
Vahdani, Behnam ;
Salimi, M. ;
Charkhchian, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 77 (1-4) :357-368
[48]   Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments [J].
Wang, Li-En ;
Liu, Hu-Chen ;
Quan, Mei-Yun .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 102 :175-185
[49]   Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean [J].
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) :1195-1207
[50]   Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA [J].
Yang, Zaili ;
Bonsall, Steve ;
Wang, Jin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2008, 57 (03) :517-528