Collaborative Engagement of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Science in Marine Environments: A Review

被引:179
作者
Thornton, Thomas F. [1 ]
Scheer, Adela Maciejewski [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2012年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
adaptive comanagement; collaborative research; collaborative resource management; ecological monitoring; environmental change; historical ecology; local and traditional knowledge (LTK); marine conservation; marine ecology; marine ecosystems; INDIGENOUS ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; EPINEPHELUS-ITAJARA TELEOSTEI; WHALES DELPHINAPTERUS-LEUCAS; SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES; SEA-ICE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PLACE-NAMES; GOLIATH GROUPER; LANDSCAPE TERMS; PROTECTED AREA;
D O I
10.5751/ES-04714-170308
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Local and traditional ecological knowledge (LTK) is increasingly recognized as an important component of scientific research, conservation, and resource management. Especially where there are gaps in the scientific literature, LTK can be a critical source of basic environmental data; this situation is particularly apparent in the case of marine ecosystems, about which comparatively less is known than terrestrial ones. We surveyed the global literature relating to the LTK of marine environments and analyzed what knowledge has been collected and with what aims and results. A large proportion of LTK which has been documented by researchers consists of species-specific information that is important for traditional resource use. However, knowledge relating to marine ecology, environmental change, and contemporary resource management practices is increasingly emphasized in the literature. Today, marine LTK is being used to provide historical and contemporary baseline information, suggest stewardship techniques, improve conservation planning and practice, and to resolve management disputes. Still, comparatively few studies are geared toward the practicalities of developing a truly collaborative, adaptive, and resilient management infrastructure that is embracive of modern science and LTK and practices in marine environments. Based on the literature, we thus suggest how such an infrastructure might be advanced through collaborative projects and "bridging" institutions that highlight the importance of trust-building and the involvement of communities in all stages of research, and the importance of shared interest in project objectives, settings (seascapes), and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 272 条
  • [1] Acheson JamesM., 1988, The Lobster Gangs of Maine
  • [2] Order out of chaos - The case for parametric fisheries management
    Acheson, JM
    Wilson, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 1996, 98 (03) : 579 - &
  • [4] Aguilar-Perera A, 2009, REV BIOL TROP, V57, P557
  • [5] Marine protected areas in Puerto Rico:: Historical and current perspectives
    Aguilar-Perera, Alfonso
    Scharer, Michelle
    Valdes-Pizzini, Manuel
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 49 (12) : 961 - 975
  • [6] AKIMICHI T, 1978, J POLYNESIAN SOC, V87, P301
  • [7] Akyeampong E., 2007, Tribes and Tribals, V1, P173
  • [8] Perception of change in freshwater in remote resource-dependent Arctic communities
    Alessa, Lilian
    Kliskey, Andrew
    Williams, Paula
    Barton, Michael
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (01): : 153 - 164
  • [9] Traditional fisherfolk and no-take protected areas: The Peixe Lagoon National Park dilemma
    Almudi, Tiago
    Kalikoski, Daniela Coswig
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 53 (5-6) : 225 - 233
  • [10] Ambali Aggrey, 2001, African Study Monographs, V22, P123