Tips and tricks for using the internet for professional purposes

被引:1
作者
Ceylan, Hasan Huseyin [1 ]
Gungoren, Nurdan [2 ]
Kucukdurmaz, Fatih [3 ]
机构
[1] Lutfiye Nuri Burat Publ Hosp, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
literature; internet; bibliographical database; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; PUBLICATION BIAS; SEARCHES; RECALL;
D O I
10.1302/2058-5241.2.160066
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Online resources provide access to large amounts of information which is expanding every day. Using search engines for reaching the relevant, updated and complete literature that is indexed in various bibliographical databases has already become part of the medical professionals' everyday life. However, most researchers often fail to conduct a efficient literature search on the internet. The right techniques in literature search save time and improve the quality of the retrieved data. Efficient literature search is not a talent but a learnable skill, which should be a formal part of medical education. This review briefly outlines the commonly used bibliographic databases, namely Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Also the definition of grey literature and its features are summarised.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 134
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] ALBERANI V, 1990, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V78, P358
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, 4 S SYST REV PUSH BO
  • [3] Beel J., 2009, P 12 INT C SCI INF I, V1
  • [4] PUBLICATION BIAS AND DISSEMINATION OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
    BEGG, CB
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (02) : 107 - 115
  • [5] Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough
    Boeker, Martin
    Vach, Werner
    Motschall, Edith
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [6] The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer W.M.
    Giustini D.
    Kramer B.M.
    Anderson P.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) : 115
  • [7] Grey literature in meta-analyses
    Conn, VS
    Valentine, JC
    Cooper, HM
    Rantz, MJ
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2003, 52 (04) : 256 - 261
  • [8] FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS
    DICKERSIN, K
    MIN, YI
    MEINERT, CL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (03): : 374 - 378
  • [9] PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    EASTERBROOK, PJ
    BERLIN, JA
    GOPALAN, R
    MATTHEWS, DR
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) : 867 - 872
  • [10] Do PubMed and Google searches help medical students and young doctors reach the correct diagnosis? A pilot study
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    Ntziora, Fotinie
    Makris, Gregory C.
    Malietzis, George A.
    Rafailidis, Petros I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 20 (08) : 788 - 790