Optimization of cloned enzyme donor immunoassay cut-offs for drugs of abuse in whole blood of drivers involved in road accidents

被引:12
作者
Pelletti, Guido [1 ]
Garagnani, Marco [1 ]
Rossi, Francesca [1 ]
Roffi, Raffaella [1 ]
Barone, Rossella [1 ]
Pelotti, Susi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Unit Legal Med, Via Irnerio 49, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Immunoassay; CEDIA; Drugs of abuse; Whole blood; Cutoff values; Optimization; CEDIA DRUGS; SERUM; HAIR; CANNABINOIDS; VALIDATION; ALCOHOL; SAMPLES; URINE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.10.023
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Introduction: Immunoassay (IA) tests should be able to detect low concentrations of illegal drugs when used for the screening of drugs in drivers. False negatives should be avoided, and false positives should be reduced as far as possible. In this study, semi-quantitative results for blood samples containing illicit drugs (cannabinoids, cocaine, amphetamines/methamphetamines, opiates and methadone) obtained with cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA), were compared with results of confirmatory analysis performed through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Screening cut-off points for each class of drugs were retrospectively optimized. Methods: Whole blood samples from drivers involved in road accidents in the period from January 2013-December 2017 were analyzed with CEDIA (4200 samples). Confirmatory analyses were performed through (GC-MS) on: (i) all samples with screening concentrations above 1 ng/ml for at least one drug (positive screening results); (ii) 800 samples with screening concentration lower than 1 ng/ml (negative screening results). Recommended per se limits in relation to driving under the influence of drugs were set as fixed values. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were evaluated by contingency tables and compared to ROC-analysis in order to obtain ideal screening cut-offs. Results: CEDIA results were available for 4200 blood samples and 1172 positive screening results were found. Among these, 1008 confirmation analysis were obtained through GC-MS. Optimized screening cut-offs obtained through ROC analysis were as follows: 8.0 ng/ml for THC; 5.5 ng/ml for THC-COOH; 21.1 ng/ml for cocaine; 6.9 ng/ml for benzoylecgonine; 33.1 ng/ml for opiates; 61.6 ng/ml for amphetamines; 5.0 ng/ml for methadone. Using these cut-offs, sensitivity was above 97% for THC-COOH, cocaine, benzoylecgonine, amphetamines, opiates and methadone, and 92% for THC; specificity was above 90% for cocaine, benzoylecgonine, amphetamines, opiates and methadone, 80% for THC and 89% for THC-COOH; negative predictive value was above 99% for all drugs and metabolites. Conclusion: Previous studies have shown that CEDIA tests are useful for preliminary screening of serum and urine. Its implementation in whole blood is of primary importance for the assessment of impaired driving, since the per se limits of many European countries refer to whole blood, and preparation of the serum and/or the collection of urine is not always possible in the hospital emergency department, where blood samples are withdrawn. Our study shows that CEDIA tests on whole blood permit the definition of cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and negative predictive values for all analytes (near to 100%), including very good specificity. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 33
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Utility of ELISA screening for the monitoring of abstinence from illegal and legal drugs in hair and urine [J].
Agius, Ronald ;
Nadulski, Thomas .
DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 2014, 6 :101-109
[3]   Evaluation of the CEDIA(TM) DAU assays and the AxSym(TM) system for the analysis of cannabinoids in whole blood [J].
Cagle, JC ;
McCurdy, HH ;
Pan, YM ;
Ayton, KJ ;
Wall, WH ;
Solomons, ET .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 21 (03) :213-217
[4]   Alcohol and drugs use among drivers injured in road accidents in Campania (Italy): A 8-years retrospective analysis [J].
Carfora, Anna ;
Campobasso, Carlo Pietro ;
Cassandro, Paola ;
Petrella, Raffaella ;
Borriello, Renata .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 288 :291-296
[5]   Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood [J].
Edwards, Lorrine D. ;
Smith, Katherine L. ;
Savage, Theodore .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 41 (06) :523-529
[6]   Alcohol and illicit drugs in drivers involved in road traffic crashes in the Milan area. A comparison with normal traffic reveals the possible inadequacy of current cut-off limits [J].
Ferrari, Davide ;
Manca, Monica ;
Banfi, Giuseppe ;
Locatelli, Massimo .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 282 :127-132
[7]  
GTFI (Italian Forensic Toxicologists Association), LIN GUID STRUTT DOT
[8]   On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results [J].
Habibzadeh, Farrokh ;
Habibzadeh, Parham ;
Yadollahie, Mahboobeh .
BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2016, 26 (03) :297-307
[9]   BLOOD CANNABINOIDS .1. ABSORPTION OF THC AND FORMATION OF 11-OH-THC AND THCCOOH DURING AND AFTER SMOKING MARIJUANA [J].
HUESTIS, MA ;
HENNINGFIELD, JE ;
CONE, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 16 (05) :276-282
[10]   Direct semiquantitative screening of drugs of abuse in serum and whole blood by means of CEDIA® DAU urine immunoassays [J].
Iwersen-Bergmann, S ;
Schmoldt, A .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 23 (04) :247-256