Flexible Linguistic Expressions and Consensus Reaching With Accurate Constraints in Group Decision-Making

被引:100
作者
Wu, Yuzhu [1 ]
Dong, Yucheng [1 ]
Qin, Jindong [2 ]
Pedrycz, Witold [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
关键词
Accuracy; consensus; flexible linguistic expression (FLE); group decision-making (GDM); linguistic decision-making; minimum preference-loss; MINIMUM-COST; TERM SETS; DISTRIBUTION ASSESSMENTS; REPRESENTATION MODEL; METHODOLOGY; INFORMATION; QUALITY; WORDS;
D O I
10.1109/TCYB.2019.2906318
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Various linguistic expressions have been presented to model the flexibility of linguistic preference expressions and to support the consensus reaching in linguistic group decision-making (GDM). In this paper, we propose the concept of flexible linguistic expressions (FLEs) as a general linguistic preference expression format to improve the flexibility of the construction of complex linguistic expressions and the elicitation of linguistic preferences and, then, we develop a new linguistic GDM model with FLEs, referred to as FLE-based GDM (FLEGDM). In the FLEGDM, an FLE aggregation process with accurate constraints is developed to improve the quality (i.e., accuracy) of the collective result as well as guarantee the principle of minimum preference-loss through a mixed 0-1 linear programming model. Meanwhile, the consensus rules with minimum preference-loss are designed to support the consensus reaching process (CRS) in the FLEGDM. Finally, we present the detailed comparative analysis involving different linguistic GDM models to show the advantages of the FLEGDM.
引用
收藏
页码:2488 / 2501
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) :149-157
[2]   Consensus Building in AHP-Group Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach [J].
Altuzarra, Alfredo ;
Maria Moreno-Jimenez, Jose ;
Salvador, Manuel .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (06) :1755-1773
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement
[4]  
Arrow KJ, 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI
[5]   Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity [J].
Ben-Arieh, D. ;
Easton, T. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2007, 43 (03) :713-721
[6]   Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information [J].
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2010, 23 (02) :169-181
[7]   Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks [J].
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Moreno, J. M. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 14 (05) :451-463
[8]   Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency [J].
Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier ;
Antonio Morente-Molinera, Juan ;
Pedrycz, Witold ;
Taghavi, Atefe ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 99 :83-92
[9]   Fuzzy linguistic approach to quality assessment model for electricity network infrastructure [J].
Celotto, Antonio ;
Loia, Vincenzo ;
Senatore, Sabrina .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 304 :1-15
[10]   The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey [J].
Chen, Xia ;
Zhang, Hengjie ;
Dong, Yucheng .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2015, 24 :72-83