Optimal Colonoscopic Surveillance Interval After Normal Baseline Screening Colonoscopy

被引：0

作者：

Dong, Jian ^{[1
]}

Wu, Minman ^{[2
]}

Miao, Jiarong ^{[3
]}

Khan, Rana Sami Ullah ^{[3
]}

Zhi, Tao ^{[4
]}

Zhang, Tianmei ^{[3
]}

Li, Xue ^{[3
]}

Peng, Yashi ^{[3
]}

Yang, Gang ^{[3
]}

Nan, Qiong ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Kunming Med Univ, Tumor Hosp Yunnan Prov, Dept Med Oncol 1, Affiliated Hosp 3, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China

[2] Yunnan Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China

[3] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, Yunnan Inst Digest Dis, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China

[4] First Peoples Hosp Bijie City, Dept Gastroenterol, Bijie, Peoples R China

来源：

GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING | 2020年 / 43卷 / 03期

关键词：

SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; MISS RATE; NEGATIVE COLONOSCOPY; RISK; POLYPECTOMY; GUIDELINES; ADENOMAS; MULTICENTER; NEOPLASIA;

D O I：

10.1097/SGA.0000000000000444

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The optimal colonoscopic surveillance interval in the Chinese population is unclear. The present study aimed to assess the optimal colonoscopic surveillance interval after normal baseline screening colonoscopy to avoid overuse or underuse of colonoscopy. This retrospective study included individuals with normal baseline colonoscopy who had undergone at least 2 follow-up colonoscopy examinations at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of our hospital between 2000 and 2013. The risk factors for adenoma and the optimal colonoscopic surveillance interval were assessed. A total of 1,005 individuals (419 men; mean age, 49.34 +/- 13.29 years) were included in the study. Of these, 169 individuals had adenomas at colonoscopic surveillance (mean, 1.32 +/- 0.79 procedures). The mean adenoma diameter was 0.54 +/- 0.38 cm, and the mean number of adenomas was 1.76 +/- 1.29. The mean adenoma surveillance interval was 4.76 +/- 2.89 years. The risk factors for adenoma identification were age more than 50 years and male gender. The optimal colonoscopic surveillance interval was 4.76 years according to an adenoma detection rate of 5%. The optimal colonoscopic surveillance interval is around 5 years for individuals with normal baseline colonoscopy. Age more than 50 years and male gender are risk factors for adenoma identification.

引用

页码：225 / 231

页数：7

共 50 条

[41] Predictors of advanced colorectal neoplasia at initial and surveillance colonoscopy after positive screening immunochemical faecal occult blood test [J].

Botteri, Edoardo ;

Crosta, Cristiano ;

Bagnardi, Vincenzo ;

Tamayo, Darina ;

Sonzogni, Angelica Maria ;

De Roberto, Giuseppe ;

de Leone, Annalisa ;

Lowenfels, Albert ;

Maisonneuve, Patrick .

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 (03) :321-326

[42] Appropriate timing and interval for surveillance colonoscopy after liver transplantation based on a single-centre experience [J].

Ryu, Dae Gon ;

Liu, Hongqun ;

Lee, Samuel S. ;

Yoon, Ki Tae ;

Brahmania, Mayur .

CANADIAN LIVER JOURNAL, 2025, 8 (01) :39-48

[43] Risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy after detection of serrated lesions: a matched case-cohort study [J].

Djinbachian, Roupen ;

Lafontaine, Marie-Lyssa ;

Anderson, Joseph C. C. ;

Pohl, Heiko ;

Dufault, Talia ;

Boivin, Michel ;

Bouin, Mickael ;

von Renteln, Daniel .

ENDOSCOPY, 2023,

[44] Using the Results of a Baseline and a Surveillance Colonoscopy to Predict Recurrent Adenomas With High-Risk Characteristics [J].

Robertson, Douglas J. ;

Burke, Carol A. ;

Welch, H. Gilbert ;

Haile, Robert W. ;

Sandler, Robert S. ;

Greenberg, E. Robert ;

Ahnen, Dennis J. ;

Bresalier, Robert S. ;

Rothstein, Richard I. ;

Cole, Bernard ;

Mott, Leila A. ;

Baron, John A. .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (02) :103-W26

[45] Factors associated with reclassification of hyperplastic polyps after pathological reassessment from screening and surveillance colonoscopies [J].

Schramm, Christoph ;

Kaiser, Moritz ;

Drebber, Uta ;

Gruenewald, Inga ;

Franklin, Jeremy ;

Kuetting, Fabian ;

Bowe, Andrea ;

Hoffmann, Vera ;

Gatzke, Sebastian ;

Toex, Ulrich ;

Steffen, Hans-Michael .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (02) :319-325

[46] Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection [J].

Komeda, Yoriaki ;

Watanabe, Tomohiro ;

Sakurai, Toshiharu ;

Kono, Masashi ;

Okamoto, Kazuki ;

Nagai, Tomoyuki ;

Takenaka, Mamoru ;

Hagiwara, Satoru ;

Matsui, Shigenaga ;

Nishida, Naoshi ;

Tsuji, Naoko ;

Kashida, Hiroshi ;

Kudo, Masatoshi .

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (12) :1502-1512

[47] Colonoscopic surveillance improves survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis in inflammatory bowel disease [J].

Lutgens, M. W. M. D. ;

Oldenburg, B. ;

Siersema, P. D. ;

van Bodegraven, A. A. ;

Dijkstra, G. ;

Hommes, D. W. ;

de Jong, D. J. ;

Stokkers, P. C. F. ;

van der Woude, C. J. ;

Vleggaar, F. P. .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (10) :1671-1675

[48] Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer Up to 10 Years After Screening, Surveillance, or Diagnostic Colonoscopy [J].

Brenner, Hermann ;

Chang-Claude, Jenny ;

Jansen, Lina ;

Knebel, Phillip ;

Stock, Christian ;

Hoffmeister, Michael .

GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (03) :709-717

[49] Optimal age for screening colonoscopy: a modeling study [J].

Chen, Chen ;

Stock, Christian ;

Hoffmeister, Michael ;

Brenner, Hermann .

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (05) :1017-+

[50] Is it safe to wait 10 years after a negative baseline screening colonoscopy result? [J].

Lieberman, David .

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (01) :260-261

← 1 2 3 4 5 →