Diabetic foot osteomyetitis: a progress report on diagnosis and a systematic review of treatment

被引:218
|
作者
Berendt, A. R. [1 ]
Peters, E. J. G. [2 ]
Bakker, K. [3 ]
Embil, J. M. [4 ]
Eneroth, M. [5 ]
Hinchliffe, R. J. [6 ]
Jeffcoate, W. J. [7 ]
Lipsky, B. A. [8 ,9 ]
Senneville, E.
Teh, J. [10 ]
Valk, G. D. [11 ]
机构
[1] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr NHS Trust, Bone Infect Unit, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Infect Dis, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] IWGDF, Heemstede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med, Infect Dis Sect, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[5] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Malmo, Sweden
[6] Univ London, St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Vasc Surg, London WC1E 7HU, England
[7] Nottingham Univ Hosp Trust, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Nottingham, England
[8] Vet Adm Puget Sound Heath Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[9] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[10] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Oxford, England
[11] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Internal Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
diabetes; diabetic foot; osteomyelitis; antibiotics; surgery; diagnosis; systematic review;
D O I
10.1002/dmrr.836
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot appointed an expert panel to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Initially, the panel formulated a consensus scheme for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) for research purposes, and undertook a systematic review of the evidence relating to treatment. The consensus diagnostic scheme was based on expert opinion; the systematic review was based on a search for reports of the effectiveness of treatment for DFO published prior to December 2006. The panel reached consensus on a proposed scheme that assesses the probability of DFO, based on clinical findings and the results of imaging and laboratory investigations. The literature review identified 1168 papers, 19 of which fulfilled criteria for detailed data extraction. No significant differences in outcome were associated with any particular treatment strategy. There was no evidence that surgical debridement of the infected bone is routinely necessary. Culture and sensitivity of isolates from bone biopsy may assist in selecting properly targeted antibiotic regimens, but empirical regimens should include agents active against staphylococci, administered either intravenously or orally (with a highly bioavailable agent). There are no data to support the superiority of any particular route of delivery of systemic antibiotics or to inform the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy. No available evidence supports the use of any adjunctive therapies, such as hyperbaric oxygen, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor or larvae. We have proposed a scheme for diagnosing DFO for research purposes. Data to inform treatment choices in DFO are limited and further research is, urgently needed. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:S145 / S161
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions in the management of infection in the diabetic foot
    Peters, E. J. G.
    Lipsky, B. A.
    Berendt, A. R.
    Embil, J. M.
    Lavery, L. A.
    Senneville, E.
    Urbancic-Rovan, V.
    Bakker, K.
    Jeffcoate, W. J.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 : 142 - 162
  • [2] Treatment of the diabetic foot by offloading: a systematic review
    de Oliveira, A. L. Martins
    Moore, Z.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2015, 24 (12) : 560 - 570
  • [3] Diagnosis of infection in the foot in diabetes: a systematic review
    Senneville, Eric
    Lipsky, Benjamin A.
    Abbas, Zulfiqarali G.
    Aragon-Sanchez, Javier
    Diggle, Mathew
    Embil, John M.
    Kono, Shigeo
    Lavery, Lawrence A.
    Malone, Matthew
    van Asten, Suzanne A.
    Urbancic-Rovan, Vilma
    Peters, Edgar J. G.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2020, 36
  • [4] Diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients with a foot ulcer. A progress report of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot
    Schaper, N. C.
    Andros, G.
    Apelqvist, J.
    Bakker, K.
    Lammer, J.
    Lepantalo, M.
    Mills, J. L.
    Reekers, J.
    Shearman, C. P.
    Zierler, R. E.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 : 218 - 224
  • [5] Update in Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections
    Miller, Andy O.
    Henry, Michael
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 20 (04) : 611 - +
  • [6] Machine Learning in the Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review
    Tulloch, Jack
    Zamani, Reza
    Akrami, Mohammad
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 198977 - 199000
  • [7] Specific guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot infections 2011
    Lipsky, B. A.
    Peters, E. J. G.
    Berendt, A. R.
    Senneville, E.
    Bakker, K.
    Embil, J. M.
    Lavery, L. A.
    Urbancic-Rovan, V.
    Jeffcoate, W. J.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 : 234 - 235
  • [8] A Comprehensive Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Diabetic Foot Infections
    不详
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2021, 34 (11) : 574 - 581
  • [9] Risk stratification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review
    M. Monteiro-Soares
    E. J. Boyko
    J. Ribeiro
    I. Ribeiro
    M. Dinis-Ribeiro
    Diabetologia, 2011, 54 : 1190 - 1199
  • [10] Metatarsal Head Resections in Diabetic Foot Patients: A Systematic Review
    Sanz-Corbalan, Irene
    Tardaguila-Garcia, Aroa
    Garcia-Alamino, Josep M.
    Garcia-Alvarez, Yolanda
    Alvaro-Afonso, Francisco Javier
    Lazaro-Martinez, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 11