A Conceptual Transdisciplinary Framework to Overcome Energy Efficiency Barriers in Ship Operation Cycles to Meet IMO's Initial Green House Gas Strategy Goals: Case Study for an Iranian Shipping Company

被引:11
作者
Vakili, Seyed Vahid [1 ]
Ballini, Fabio [1 ]
Dalaklis, Dimitrios [2 ]
Olcer, Aykut, I [1 ]
机构
[1] World Maritime Univ WMU, Maritime Energy Management MEM, S-21118 Malmo, Sweden
[2] World Maritime Univ WMU, Maritime Safety & Environm Adm MSEA, S-21118 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
air emissions; energy efficiency barriers; energy policy; life cycle management; energy management system; transdisciplinary; DRIVING FORCES; MARKET; TECHNOLOGIES; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.3390/en15062098
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Through a systematic, holistic and transdisciplinary approach and by proposing five phases of "goal information", "system analyzing", "scenario construction", "multi-criteria assessment" and "strategy building", the study offers a process for recognizing and prioritizing energy-efficient barriers in the ship's operational cycle according to decision-makers' concerns. The study utilized the proposed conceptual transdisciplinary framework for overcoming energy efficiency barriers in ship operating cycles. The framework categorizes the barriers in the operational cycle into five disciplines, i.e., operations, policy and regulations, technology and innovation, human element and economics, and applies the framework to an Iranian shipping company. The results show that the economic discipline has the highest priority, and the human discipline has the least importance for the company's decision makers. In addition, "adverse selection" (operational discipline), "policy implementation" (policy and regulatory discipline), "split incentives" (economic discipline), "limited access to capital" (economic discipline) and "imperfect budgeting" were the main barriers to energy efficiency in the company.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Acciaro M., 2013, Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, V3, P1, DOI [DOI 10.17265/2159-5879/2013.01.008, 10.17265/2159-5879/2013.01.008]
[3]   A review of cleaner alternative fuels for maritime transportation [J].
Al-Enazi, Ahad ;
Okonkwo, Eric C. ;
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Al-Ansari, Tareq .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 :1962-1985
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, IMPROVING ENERGY EFF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, REV MARITIME TRANSPO, DOI DOI 10.18356/D4F1AA11-EN
[6]   Green hydrogen as an alternative fuel for the shipping industry [J].
Atilhan, Selma ;
Park, Sunhwa ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. ;
Atilhan, Mert ;
Moore, Margaux ;
Nielsen, Rasmus B. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 31
[7]   Extending the energy efficiency gap [J].
Backlund, Sandra ;
Thollander, Patrik ;
Palm, Jenny ;
Ottosson, Mikael .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :392-396
[8]   OVERCOMING SOCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS TO ENERGY-CONSERVATION [J].
BLUMSTEIN, C ;
KRIEG, B ;
SCHIPPER, L ;
YORK, C .
ENERGY, 1980, 5 (04) :355-371
[9]   Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies [J].
Brown, MA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (14) :1197-1207
[10]   Energy efficiency policy evaluation by moving from techno-economic towards whole society perspective on energy efficiency market [J].
Bukarica, Vesna ;
Tomsic, Zeljko .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 70 :968-975