The performance and safety of motorized spiral enteroscopy, including in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a multicenter prospective study

被引:25
作者
Al-Toma, Abdulbaqi [1 ]
Beaumont, Hanneke [2 ]
Koornstra, Jan Jacob [3 ]
van Boeckel, Petra [1 ]
Hergelink, Dorien Oude [3 ]
van der Kraan, Jolein [4 ]
Inderson, Akin [4 ]
de Ridder, Rogier [5 ]
Jacobs, Maarten [2 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Locat VUMC, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
SMALL-BOWEL DISORDERS; DOUBLE-BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY; DEVICE-ASSISTED ENTEROSCOPY; THERAPEUTIC IMPACT; DIAGNOSTIC YIELD; SINGLE-CENTER; ENDOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1783-4802
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Data are scarce on the efficacy and safety of motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE). No data are available on the utility of this technique in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal (GI) anatomy. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MSE in patients with suspected small-bowel disease, including those with surgically altered GI anatomy. Methods A multicenter prospective observational, uncontrolled study evaluated MSE in consecutive patients with suspected small-bowel pathology and an indication for diagnostic and/or therapeutic intervention. Results A total of 170 patients (102 men; median age 64 years, range 18 89) were included. The overall diagnostic yield was 64.1 %. Endotherapy was performed in 53.5 % of procedures. The median total procedure times for the antegrade and retrograde approaches were 45 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 30 80) and 40 minutes (IQR 30 70), respectively. When total (pan)enteroscopy was intended, this was achieved at rate of 70.3 % (28.1 % by antegrade approach and 42.2 % by a bidirectional approach). Surgically altered GI anatomy was present in 34 /170 of all procedures (20.0 %) and in 11 /45 of the successful total enteroscopy procedures (24.4 %). Propofol sedation or general anesthesia were used in 92.9 % and 7.1 % of the procedures, respectively. Minor adverse events were observed in 15.9 % of patients, but there were no major adverse events. Conclusion MSE seems to be an effective and safe endoscopic procedure. Total (pan)enteroscopy can be achieved, in one or two sessions, even in the presence of surgically altered GI anatomy. The total procedure time is relatively short. For both antegrade and retrograde MSE procedures, propofol sedation seems sufficient and safe. © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1042
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Spiral enteroscopy: a novel method of enteroscopy by using the Endo-Ease Discovery SB overtube and a pediatric colonoscope [J].
Akerman, Paul A. ;
Agrawal, Deepak ;
Chen, William ;
Cantero, Daniel ;
Avila, Jose ;
Pangtay, Jesus .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (02) :327-332
[2]   Balloon enteroscopy versus spiral enteroscopy for small-bowel disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Baniya, Ramkaji ;
Upadhaya, Sunil ;
Subedi, Subash Chandra ;
Khan, Jahangir ;
Sharma, Prabin ;
Mohammed, Tabrez Shaik ;
Bachuwa, Ghassan ;
Jamil, Laith H. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 86 (06) :997-1005
[3]   Total motorized spiral enteroscopy: first prospective clinical feasibility trial [J].
Beyna, Torsten ;
Arvanitakis, Marianna ;
Schneider, Markus ;
Gerges, Christian ;
Hoellerich, Joerg ;
Deviere, Jacques ;
Neuhaus, Horst .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) :1362-1370
[4]   Motorised spiral enteroscopy: first prospective clinical feasibility study [J].
Beyna, Torsten ;
Arvanitakis, Marianna ;
Schneider, Markus ;
Gerges, Christian ;
Hoellerich, Joerg ;
Deviere, Jacques ;
Neuhaus, Horst .
GUT, 2021, 70 (02) :261-267
[5]   Milestone in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Double-balloon enteroscopy of the small bowel [J].
Heine, G. D. ;
Al-Toma, A. ;
Mulder, C. J. J. ;
Jacobs, M. A. J. M. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 41 :32-38
[6]  
Inavolu Pradev, 2020, VideoGIE, V5, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.05.014
[7]   Assessment of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation in Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Irfan, Mujammil ;
Ahmed, Mohammed ;
Breen, David .
JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) :130-137
[8]   A comparative evaluation of single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy for patients with mid-gut disorders [J].
Khashab, Mouen A. ;
Lennon, Anne Marie ;
Dunbar, Kerry B. ;
Singh, Vikesh K. ;
Chandrasekhara, Vinay ;
Giday, Samuel ;
Canto, Marcia I. ;
Buscaglia, Jonathan M. ;
Kapoor, Sumit ;
Shin, Eun Ji ;
Kalloo, Anthony N. ;
Okolo, Patrick I., III .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (04) :766-772
[9]   Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy [J].
Lenz, Philipp ;
Domagk, Dirk .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 26 (03) :303-313
[10]   Prospective, cross-over, single-center trial comparing oral double-balloon enteroscopy and oral spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel vascular malformations [J].
May, A. ;
Manner, H. ;
Aschmoneit, I. ;
Ell, C. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (06) :477-483