Why Am I Getting This Ad? How the Degree of Targeting Disclosures and Political Fit Affect Persuasion Knowledge, Party Evaluation, and Online Privacy Behaviors

被引:23
作者
Binder, Alice [1 ]
Stubenvoll, Marlis [1 ]
Hirsch, Melanie [1 ]
Matthes, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Commun, Advertising & Media Psychol Res Grp, Wahringer Str 29, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
SPONSORED CONTENT; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; FACEBOOK; VOTERS; TRUST; PERSONALIZATION; ADVERTISEMENTS; RESISTANCE; ATTITUDE;
D O I
10.1080/00913367.2021.2015727
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Political advertising on social media heavily capitalizes on the fact that citizens leave behind data traces through their online behaviors. Even though this allows parties to target citizens based on their age, gender, or even specific interests, there is often a mismatch between the parties and the individuals' party preferences. This study investigates how different degrees of targeting disclosures (demographic/location-based targeting disclosure versus preference-based targeting disclosure) and the political fit of targeted ads (high fit versus low fit) affect participants' party evaluation and online privacy behaviors. Two dimensions of persuasion knowledge, perceived manipulative intent (PMI) and targeting knowledge (TK), act as mediators. Results from an online experiment (N = 430) reveal that the degree of targeting disclosure did not activate these dimensions. However, high political fit of the ads led to lower PMI and higher TK. In addition, political fit improved party evaluations via PMI and TK and reduced privacy behaviors via PMI. We conclude that citizens do not activate their defense mechanisms against targeted ads when the targeting comes from a favored party.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 222
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness [J].
Aguirre, Elizabeth ;
Mahr, Dominik ;
Grewal, Dhruv ;
de Ruyter, Ko ;
Wetzels, Martin .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (01) :34-49
[2]   Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion [J].
Ahluwalia, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (02) :217-232
[3]  
Anstead N., 2018, POLITICAL INSIGHT, V9, P32, DOI [10.1177/2041905818779333, DOI 10.1177/2041905818779333]
[4]   Data-Driven Campaigning in the 2015 United Kingdom General Election [J].
Anstead, Nick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2017, 22 (03) :294-313
[5]  
Auxier B., 2019, AMERICANS PRIVACY CO
[6]   The Myths of Data-Driven Campaigning [J].
Baldwin-Philippi, Jessica .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2017, 34 (04) :627-633
[7]  
Barocas S, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST EDITION WORKSHOP ON POLITICS, ELECTIONS AND DATA, P31
[8]   Online Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management: A Meta-Analytical Review [J].
Baruh, Lemi ;
Secinti, Ekin ;
Cemalcilar, Zeynep .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2017, 67 (01) :26-53
[9]   Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where [J].
Bleier, Alexander ;
Eisenbeiss, Maik .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2015, 34 (05) :669-688
[10]   The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising [J].
Bleier, Alexander ;
Eisenbeiss, Maik .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (03) :390-409