Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison with open radical nephrectomy

被引:23
作者
Lee, SE
Ku, JH
Kwak, C
Kim, HH
Paick, SH
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
kidney; carcinoma; renal cell; laparoscopy; nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000080537.28752.aa
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the results of hand assisted laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: Clinical data on 54 hand assisted and 50 open radical nephrectomies performed at our hospital from September 1999 to October 2002 were reviewed. Results: Mean operative time in the laparoscopic and open groups was similar (194.9 and 180.7 minutes, respectively, p = 0.087). However, estimated mean blood loss (182.8 vs 262.8 ml, p <0.001), mean days to oral intake (2.6 vs 3.7 days, p <0.001) mean duration of an indwelling drain (2.6 vs 3.2 days, p <0.001) and mean hospital stay (6.8 vs 8.9 days, p <0.001) were significantly less in the laparoscopic group. In the laparoscopic group no conversions or reexplorations were required and no major complications occurred. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy represents an effective, minimally invasive treatment option in patients with suspected renal cell carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 759
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy
    Abbou, CC
    Cicco, A
    Gasman, D
    Hoznek, A
    Antiphon, P
    Chopin, DK
    Salomon, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (06) : 1776 - 1780
  • [2] Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: Evaluation of efficacy and safety: A multicenter experience
    Cadeddu, JA
    Ono, Y
    Clayman, RV
    Barrett, PH
    Janetschek, G
    Fentie, DD
    McDougall, EM
    Moore, RG
    Kinukawa, T
    Elbahnasy, AM
    Nelson, JB
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (05) : 773 - 777
  • [3] LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY - INITIAL CASE-REPORT
    CLAYMAN, RV
    KAVOUSSI, LR
    SOPER, NJ
    DIERKS, SM
    MERETYK, S
    DARCY, MD
    ROEMER, FD
    PINGLETON, ED
    THOMSON, PG
    LONG, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (02) : 278 - 282
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-year experience
    Dunn, MD
    Portis, AJ
    Shalhav, AL
    Elbahnasy, AM
    Heidorn, C
    McDougall, EM
    Clayman, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (04) : 1153 - 1159
  • [5] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: The Cleveland Clinic experience
    Gill, IS
    Schweizer, D
    Hobart, MG
    Sung, GT
    Klein, EA
    Novick, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (06) : 1665 - 1670
  • [6] Survey of urological laparoscopic practices in the state of California
    Kaynan, AM
    Lee, KL
    Winfield, HN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) : 2380 - 2386
  • [7] KUSMINSKY RE, 1995, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V5, P463
  • [8] Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort System - Initial experience with 68 patients
    Litwin, DEM
    Darzi, A
    Jakimowicz, J
    Kelly, JJ
    Arvidsson, D
    Hansen, P
    Callery, MP
    Denis, R
    Fowler, DL
    Medich, DS
    O'Reilly, MJ
    Atlas, H
    Himpens, JM
    Swanstrom, LL
    Arous, EJ
    Pattyn, P
    Yood, SM
    Ricciardi, R
    Sandor, A
    Meyers, WC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (05) : 715 - 721
  • [9] Mancini GJ, 2002, AM SURGEON, V68, P151
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: The Washington University experience
    McDougall, EM
    Clayman, RV
    Elashry, OM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04) : 1180 - 1185