Understanding Diverse Perspectives on Genetic Research Through Focus Group Talk

被引:3
|
作者
Ridgeway, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Albertie, Monica [2 ]
Pantoja, Elizabeth [2 ]
Prescott, Darin [3 ]
Zhu, Xuan [4 ]
Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki [4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Off Hlth Dispar Res, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[3] Lower Sioux Hlth Care Ctr, Morton, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS | 2019年 / 18卷
关键词
genetic research; biobank; research participation; racial; ethnic minority; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; HEALTH DISPARITIES; INFORMED-CONSENT; GENOMICS; PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; COMMUNICATION; FACILITATORS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1177/1609406919892476
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
While genetic research (GR) is fueling discoveries in fields like precision medicine, there is a growing concern that underrepresentation of racial and ethnic populations in GR will limit access to its benefits and subsequently worsen health disparities. This study aimed to understand GR perceptions among members from underrepresented communities by studying discourse and language use in focus group discussions. Nine focus groups were conducted with adults from three populations: African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native American; 53 women and 15 men participated. Data were analyzed using methods of discourse and content analysis. Discourse analysis highlighted how conceptualization of science and family-rooted in historical experiences-can influence views on GR risks and benefits to self and others. The use of focus group discourse in particular provided an opportunity for group sense making around the science and ethics of GR. Content analysis highlighted differences between the language use of focus group moderators, who spoke about scientific discovery and research oversight, and that of participants, whose talk highlighted ancestral bloodline, personal risk, and ethical concerns. The findings can inform efforts to bolster GR participation, including recruitment and educational campaigns. However, they also challenge researchers to consider areas of discordance between their own and community members' conceptualization of the risks and benefits of GR participation, including the notion of future and family benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Perspectives on Group Benefits and Harms in Genetic Research
    Goldenberg, A. J.
    Hull, S. C.
    Wilfond, B. S.
    Sharp, R. R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2011, 14 (03) : 135 - 142
  • [2] Adolescents' Understanding of Research Concepts A Focus Group Study
    Blake, Diane R.
    Lemay, Celeste A.
    Kearney, Margaret H.
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2011, 165 (06): : 533 - 539
  • [3] Public Understanding and Opinions regarding Genetic Research on Alzheimer's Disease
    Kent, Saida
    Bardach, Shoshana H.
    Zhang, Xuan
    Abner, Erin L.
    Grill, Joshua D.
    Jicha, Gregory A.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2018, 21 (5-6) : 228 - 237
  • [4] HUMAN TISSUE SAMPLES FOR RESEARCH. A FOCUS GROUP STUDY IN ADULTS AND TEENAGERS IN FLANDERS
    Hens, K.
    Dierickx, K.
    GENETIC COUNSELING, 2010, 21 (02): : 157 - 168
  • [5] Perspectives on Focus Group Participation and Remuneration
    Mosavel, Maghboeba
    Oakar, Catherine
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (04) : 341 - 349
  • [6] Understanding of research, genetics and genetic research in a rapid ethical assessment in north west Cameroon
    Kengne-Ouafo, Jonas A.
    Millard, James D.
    Nji, Theobald M.
    Tantoh, William F.
    Nyoh, Doris N.
    Tendongfor, Nicholas
    Enyong, Peter A.
    Newport, Melanie J.
    Davey, Gail
    Wanji, Samuel
    INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2016, 8 (03): : 197 - 203
  • [7] Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study
    Simon, Christian M.
    Schartz, Helen A.
    Rosenthal, Gary E.
    Eisenstein, Eric L.
    Klein, David W.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2018, 13 (04) : 338 - 348
  • [8] Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences
    McGowan, Michelle L.
    Prows, Cynthia A.
    DeJonckheere, Melissa
    Brinkman, William B.
    Vaughn, Lisa
    Myers, Melanie F.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2018, 13 (04) : 371 - 382
  • [9] Culturally diverse collaborations: a focus on communication and shared understanding
    Vangen, Siv
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 19 (03) : 305 - 325
  • [10] Understanding Public Opinion in Debates over Biomedical Research: Looking beyond Political Partisanship to Focus on Beliefs about Science and Society
    Nisbet, Matthew
    Markowitz, Ezra M.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):