Understanding how teachers practise inclusive classroom assessment

被引:2
作者
Lin, Pei-Ying [1 ]
Lin, Yu-Cheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Educ, Dept Educ Psychol & Special Educ, 28 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Dept Psychol Sci, 1201 W Univ Dr, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
关键词
Assessment accommodations; Assessment practices; Classroom assessment; Inclusive education; Special education; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; ACCOMMODATIONS; PROFICIENCY; JUDGMENTS; STANDARDS; KNOWLEDGE; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study was undertaken to better understand how Canadian teachers utilized the three major purposes of assessment for students with diverse needs through a questionnaire that reflected major concepts of AFL, AOL, and ACC (assessment for and of learning; accommodations and modifications). We found that a higher percentage of teachers-especially special education teachers-reported offering ACC frequently to their students than did those who reported practising AFL and AOL frequently. In line with the literature, our findings suggest that AOL was adopted by a greater percentage of teachers than AFL, especially when teachers reported practising AAL (assessment as learning which is considered a subset of AFL) less frequently. Our data also shows that teachers who put one assessment concept into practice tended to utilize the other concepts. Finally, a small but notable number of teachers surveyed reported sometimes or never implementing AFL, AOL, and ACC in class.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 121
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条