Role of apparent diffusion coefficient as a biomarker in the evaluation of cervical cancer

被引:10
作者
Dashottar, Sunita [1 ]
Pany, T. Preeth [1 ]
Lohia, Nishant [2 ]
机构
[1] Command Hosp Cent Command, Dept Radiol & Imaging, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Command Hosp Cent Command, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; cervical cancer; concurrent chemoradiation therapy; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; TREATMENT RESPONSE; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; TUMORS; MRI;
D O I
10.4103/ijri.IJRI_441_18
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) has evolved as a major diagnostic and prognostic tool in cervical cancer. The aim of our study was to compare the change in mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value before and after concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in carcinoma cervix thereby establishing its role as a cancer biomarker. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective study was conducted in 35 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. All 35 patients underwent pelvic MRI before and after 6 months of CCRT. The study was done over a period of 12 months. Conventional axial and sagittal T2 imaging was followed by DW-MRI. In the axial DW/ADC images at "b-value" of 800 s/mm(2), a circular region of interest was drawn covering more than 60% of the tumor volume to calculate the ADC values. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21.0) was used for statistical evaluation. Chi-square test, independent samples t-test, and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. The results are depicted as frequencies (number), proportion (percentages), and mean +/- standard deviation. Results: Pre-CCRT mean ADC value was 0.814 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Post-CCRT mean ADC value was 1.294 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Mean ADC value of patients having lymph node involvement and parametrial extension was significantly lower when compared with those without lymph node involvement and parametrial extension (P = 0.001). Nonresponders with residual lesion had lower ADC values than responders with no residual lesion. An interesting and unique observation was that pre-CCRT mean ADC value of responders was higher than nonresponders. Conclusion: An increase in mean ADC value of 0.480 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s after CCRT was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.001) thereby proving its role as an imaging biomarker in cancer cervix.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Apparent diffusion coefficient for prediction of parametrial invasion in cervical cancer: a critical evaluation based on stratification to a Likert scale using T2-weighted imaging
    Woo, Sungmin
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2018, 123 (03): : 209 - 216
  • [32] Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation
    Daniel Grossi Marconi
    Jose Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani
    Rodrigo Ribeiro Rossini
    Ana Karina Borges Junqueira Netto
    Fabiano Rubião Lucchesi
    Audrey Tieko Tsunoda
    Mitchell Kamrava
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 16
  • [33] Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation
    Marconi, Daniel Grossi
    Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani, Jose Humberto
    Rossini, Rodrigo Ribeiro
    Borges Junqueira Netto, Ana Karina
    Lucchesi, Fabiano Rubiao
    Tsunoda, Audrey Tieko
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [34] Apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic biomarker of upper urinary tract cancer: a preliminary report
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Kobayashi, Shuichiro
    Koga, Fumitaka
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Ishii, Chikako
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Nakanishi, Yasukazu
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Numao, Noboru
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (08) : 2206 - 2214
  • [35] MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC): A biomarker for prostate cancer after radiation therapy
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Scialpi, Pietro
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Mignogna, Marcello
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    Trippa, Fabio
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 47 (06): : 448 - 451
  • [36] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Predictive Biomarker of Prostate Cancer Progression: Value of Fast and Slow Diffusion Components
    Giles, Sharon L.
    Morgan, Veronica A.
    Riches, Sophie F.
    Thomas, Karen
    Parker, Christopher
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) : 586 - 591
  • [37] Impact of different b-value combinations on radiomics features of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer
    He, Yaoyao
    Rong, Yi
    Chen, Hao
    Zhang, Zhaoxi
    Qiu, Jianfeng
    Zheng, Lili
    Benedict, Stanley
    Niu, Xiaohui
    Pan, Ning
    Liu, Yulin
    Yuan, Zilong
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (04) : 568 - 576
  • [38] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Novel Imaging Biomarker of Myopathic Changes in Liver Cirrhosis
    Surov, Alexey
    Paul, Lisa
    Meyer, Hans Jonas
    Schob, Stefan
    Engelmann, Cornelius
    Wienke, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (10):
  • [39] Delta corticomedullary apparent diffusion coefficient on MRI as a biomarker for prognosis in IgA nephropathy
    Wang, Zitao
    Jiang, Ling
    Lu, Fang
    Qian, Li
    Pan, Ying
    Zhang, Chengning
    Huang, Zhimin
    Zeng, Ming
    Sun, Bin
    Zhang, Bo
    Mao, Huijuan
    Zhang, Yudong
    Duan, Suyan
    Xing, Changying
    Yuan, Yanggang
    [J]. RENAL FAILURE, 2025, 47 (01)
  • [40] Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness
    Kobayashi, Shuichiro
    Koga, Fumitaka
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Ishii, Chikako
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Komai, Yoshinobu
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Kihara, Kazunori
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (10) : 2178 - 2186