Changes in Pre-service Science Teachers' Understandings After Being Involved in Explicit Nature of Science and Socioscientific Argumentation Processes

被引:27
作者
Kutluca, A. Y. [1 ]
Aydin, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Elementary Educ Dept Classroom Teaching, Fac Educ, TR-34000 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Kastamonu Univ, Dept Elementary Sci, Fac Educ, TR-37100 Kastamonu, Turkey
关键词
SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES; SCHOOL SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; ELEMENTARY; EDUCATION; BELIEFS; SKILLS; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1007/s11191-017-9919-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The study explored the changes in pre-service science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and their opinions about the nature of science, science teaching and argumentation after their participation in explicit nature of science (NOS) and socioscientific argumentation processes. The participants were 56 third-grade pre-service science teachers studying in a state university in Turkey. The treatment group comprised 27 participants, and there were 29 participants in the comparison group. The comparison group participants were involved in a student-centred science-teaching process, and the participants of the treatment group were involved in explicit NOS and socioscientific argumentation processes. In the study, which lasted a total of 11 weeks, a NOS-as-argumentation questionnaire was administered to all the participants to determine their understanding of NOS at the beginning and end of the data collection process, and six random participants of the treatment group participated in semi-structured interview questions in order to further understand their views regarding NOS, science teaching and argumentation. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis revealed that the explicit NOS and socioscientific argumentation processes had a significant effect on pre-service science teachers' NOS understandings. Furthermore, NOS, argumentation and science teaching views of the participants in the treatment group showed a positive change. The results of this study are discussed in light of the related literature, and suggestions are made within the context of contribution to science-teaching literature, improvement of education quality and education of pre-service teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 668
页数:32
相关论文
共 83 条
[71]   Articulation of Conceptual Knowledge and Argumentation Practices by High School Students in Evolution Problems [J].
Tavares, Marina de Lima ;
Jimenez-Aleixandre, Maria-Pilar ;
Mortimer, Eduardo F. .
SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2010, 19 (6-8) :573-598
[72]   The relationships between teachers' general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs [J].
Van Driel, Jan H. ;
Bulte, Astrid M. W. ;
Verloop, Nico .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2007, 17 (02) :156-171
[73]   Argumentation in Science Teacher Education: The simulated jury as a resource for teaching and learning [J].
Vieira, Rodrigo Drumond ;
da Rocha Bernardo, Jose Roberto ;
Evagorou, Maria ;
de Melo, Viviane Florentino .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (07) :1113-1139
[74]   Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge [J].
von Aufschnaiter, Claudia ;
Erduran, Sibel ;
Osborne, Jonathan ;
Simon, Shirley .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2008, 45 (01) :101-131
[75]   Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry [J].
Walker, Kimberly A. ;
Zeidler, Dana L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 29 (11) :1387-1410
[76]  
Zeidler DL, 2014, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL II, P697
[77]   Advancing Reflective judgment through Socioscientific Issues [J].
Zeidler, Dana L. ;
Sadler, Troy D. ;
Applebaum, Scott ;
Callahan, Brendan E. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2009, 46 (01) :74-101
[78]   Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas [J].
Zeidler, DL ;
Walker, KA ;
Ackett, WA ;
Simmons, ML .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2002, 86 (03) :343-367
[79]  
Zeidler DL, 1997, SCI EDUC, V81, P483
[80]  
Zeidler DL., 2008, Science Education, V17, P799, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11191-007-9130-6, 10.1007/s11191-007-9130, DOI 10.1007/S11191-007-9130]