Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: Chronologic changes in the trends and clinical outcomes through a 15-year, single-center experience with 2212 patients

被引:7
|
作者
Park, Yejong [1 ]
Hwang, Dae Wook [1 ]
Lee, Jae Hoon [1 ]
Song, Ki Byung [1 ]
Jun, Eunsung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Woohyung [1 ]
Hong, Sarang [1 ]
Kim, Song Cheol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg,Dept Surg, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Convergence Med,Asan Inst Life Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
chronologic change; minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy; minimally invasive surgery; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; pancreatic tumor; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; RESECTION; DEFINITION; CONVERSION; CONSENSUS; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1002/jhbp.1122
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background We identified the chronologic changes in the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) for left-sided pancreatic tumors in a single high-volume center over a period of 15 years. Methods Between 2005 and 2019, 2212 patients underwent planned MIDP. Chronologic changes were analyzed according to 5-year intervals (P1, P2, P3). Furthermore, we assessed the prognostic factors of open conversion and postoperative complications. Results Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy has steadily increased during the last 15 years when compared to open distal pancreatectomy, from 10.8% to 84.9%. Also, MIDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been steadily increasing from 5.6% to 68.4%. According to the 5-year intervals, lengths of hospital stay decreased, but age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >= 3 increased; conversely, the rates of Clavien-Dindo classification >= grade 3 (9.5%) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (39.7%) showed no differences. The 90-day mortality and open conversion rates were 0.2% and 3.5%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed malignancy and extended pancreatectomy were risk factors for open conversion. Furthermore, the poor prognostic factors for severe complications were malignancy, extended pancreatectomy, and ASA >= 3. Conclusion Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy has become a popular procedure not only for benign cases but also for malignant ones. However, well-organized training, experience and skill are necessary, especially for poor-performance patients and extensively malignant conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 551
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Oncological outcomes of palliative minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for unexpected metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A single-center experience
    Park, Yejong
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Song, Ki Byung
    Jun, Eunsung
    Lee, Woohyung
    Sung, Min Kyu
    Kim, Song Cheol
    SURGERY, 2025, 182
  • [2] Minimally invasive treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 15-year single referral center’s experience on 215 patients
    Marcello Ceccaroni
    Giovanni Roviglione
    Antonino Farulla
    Pietro Bertoglio
    Roberto Clarizia
    Andrea Viti
    Daniele Mautone
    Matteo Ceccarello
    Anna Stepniewska
    Alberto Claudio Terzi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 6807 - 6817
  • [3] Minimally invasive treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 15-year single referral center's experience on 215 patients
    Marcello, Ceccaroni
    Roviglione, Giovanni
    Antonino, Farulla
    Pietro, Bertoglio
    Roberto, Clarizia
    Andrea, Viti
    Daniele, Mautone
    Matteo, Ceccarello
    Anna, Stepniewska
    Terzi, Alberto Claudio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (12): : 6807 - 6817
  • [4] Propensity-Score Matched Analyses Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomies: A Single-Center Experience
    Raghupathy, Jaivikash
    Lee, Chuan-Yaw
    Huan, Sarah K. W.
    Koh, Ye-Xin
    Tan, Ek-Khoon
    Teo, Jin-Yao
    Cheow, Peng-Chung
    Ooi, London L. P. J.
    Chung, Alexander Y. F.
    Chan, Chung-Yip
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 46 (01) : 207 - 214
  • [5] Long-term survival outcomes of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A cohort study with 15-year single-center experience
    Xie, Qing-Feng
    Long, Lian-Sheng
    Luo, Yang-Yang
    Lu, Meng-Ting
    Ming, Wai-Kit
    Zhao, Li-Ying
    Liu, Hao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2025, 17 (02):
  • [6] Clinical significance of pancreatic calcifications: a 15-year single-center observational study
    Wang, Wei
    Chai, Li
    Zhu, Naiyi
    Wang, Qingrou
    Zhou, Yiran
    Chai, Weimin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [7] Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly and octogenarian patients: a single-center, comparative study
    Chen, Ke
    Pan, Yu
    Mou, Yi-ping
    Yan, Jia-fei
    Zhang, Ren-chao
    Zhang, Miao-zun
    Zhou, Jia-yu
    Wang, Xian-fa
    Maher, Hendi
    Chen, Qi-long
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2142 - 2151
  • [8] Minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robot-assisted) approach for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the distal pancreas: a single-center experience
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Choi, Sung Hoon
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Chi, Hoon Sang
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [9] Are There Any Limiting Factors of Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy in Children? Over 20-Year Single-Center Experience
    Sosnowska-Sienkiewicz, Patrycja
    Strauss, Ewa
    Bucko, Ewa
    Dopierala, Maria
    Mankowski, Przemyslaw
    Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska, Danuta
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 94 (05) : 46 - 53
  • [10] Conversion to open laparotomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: lessons from a single-center experience in 70 consecutive patients
    Matsumoto, Ippei
    Kamei, Keiko
    Satoi, Shumpei
    Murase, Takaaki
    Matsumoto, Masataka
    Kawaguchi, Kohei
    Yoshida, Yuta
    Lee, Dongha
    Takebe, Atsushi
    Nakai, Takuya
    Takeyama, Yoshifumi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (01) : 70 - 78