Trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise

被引:115
作者
Farrokhi, Shawn
Pollard, Christine D.
Souza, Richard B.
Chen, Yu-Jen
Reischl, Stephen [1 ]
Powers, Christopher M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Div Biokinesiol & Phys Therapy, Musculoskeletal Biomech Res Lab, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
biomechanics; EMG; impulse; weight bearing;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2008.2634
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To examine how a change in trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise. BACKGROUND: Altering the position of the trunk during the forward lunge exercise is thought to affect the muscular actions of the lead lower extremity. However, no studies have compared the biomechanical differences between the traditional forward lunge and its variations. METHODS AND MEASURES: Ten healthy adults (5 males, 5 females; mean age +/- SID, 26.7 +/- 3.2 years) participated. Lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyographic (EMG) data were obtained while subjects performed 3 lunge exercises: normal lunge with the trunk erect (NIL), lunge with the trunk forward (LTF), and lunge with trunk extension (LTE). A 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare lower extremity kinematics, joint impulse (area under the moment-time curve), and normalized EMG (highest 1-second window of activity for selected lower extremity muscles) among the 3 lunge conditions. RESULTS: During the LTF condition, significant increases were noted in peak hip flexion angle, hip extensor and ankle plantar flexor impulse, as well as gluteus maximus and biceps femoris EMG (P<.015) when compared to the NIL condition. During the LTE condition, a significant increase was noted in peak ankle dorsiflexion angle and a significant decrease was noted in peak hip flexion angle (P<.015) compared to the NL condition. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a lunge with the trunk forward increased the hip extensor impulse and the recruitment of the hip extensors. In contrast, performing a forward lunge with the trunk extended did not alter joint impulse or activation of the lower extremity musculature.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 409
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Basmajian J.V., 1985, Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography
[2]  
Bennell Kim L, 1998, Aust J Physiother, V44, P175
[3]  
Beutler AI, 2002, J ATHL TRAINING, V37, P13
[4]  
Boyden G, 2000, J STRENGTH COND RES, V14, P379
[5]  
Cram JeffreyR., 1998, Introduction to Surface Electromyography
[6]   Lunge performance and its determinants [J].
Cronin, J ;
McNair, PJ ;
Marshall, RN .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2003, 21 (01) :49-57
[7]   Kinematic, kinetic and EMG patterns during downward squatting [J].
Dionisio, Valdeci Carlos ;
Almeida, Gi Luicio ;
Duarte, Marcos ;
Hirata, Rogerio Pessoto .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) :134-143
[8]   Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises [J].
Escamilla, RF ;
Fleisig, GS ;
Zheng, NG ;
Barrentine, SW ;
Wilk, KE ;
Andrews, JR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1998, 30 (04) :556-569
[9]   A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths [J].
Escamilla, RF ;
Fleisig, GS ;
Lowry, TM ;
Barrentine, SW ;
Andrews, JR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (06) :984-998
[10]   Squatting exercises in older adults: Kinematic and kinetic comparisons [J].
Flanagan, S ;
Salem, GJ ;
Wang, MY ;
Sanker, SE ;
Greendale, GA .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2003, 35 (04) :635-643