Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:56
作者
Koeck, Franz Xaver [1 ]
Beckmann, Johannes
Luring, Christian
Rath, Bjoern
Grifka, Joachim
Basad, Erhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-93077 Bad Abbach, Germany
[2] Univ Giessen, D-35390 Giessen, Germany
关键词
Knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental; Customized; Alignment; Implant positioning; NAVIGATION; REPLACEMENT; ACCURACY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2010.06.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Implant positioning and knee alignment are two primary goals of successful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. This prospective study outlines the radiographic results following 32 patient-specific unicompartmental medial resurfacing knee arthroplasties. By means of standardized pre- and postoperative radiographs of the knee in strictly AP and lateral view, AP weight bearing long leg images as well as preoperative CT-based planning drawings an analysis of implant positioning and leg axis correction was performed.The mean preoperative coronal femoro-tibial angle was corrected from 7 degrees to 1 degrees (p<0.001). The preoperative medial proximal tibial angle of 87 degrees was corrected to 89 degrees (p<0.001). The preoperative tibial slope of 5 degrees could be maintained. The extent of the dorsal femoral cut was equivalent to the desired value of 5 mm given by the CT-based planning guide. The mean accuracy of the tibial component fit was 0 mm in antero-posterior and + 1 mm in medio-lateral projection. Patient-specific fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can restore leg axis reliably, obtain a medial proximal tibial angle of 90 degrees, avoid an implant mal-positioning and ensure maximal tibial coverage. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 299
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee [J].
Ackroyd, CE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (07) :937-942
[2]   St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement - 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years [J].
Ansari, S ;
Newman, JH ;
Ackroyd, CE .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 68 (05) :430-434
[3]   Multiparameter quantitative computer-assisted tomography assessment of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties [J].
Campbell, David G. ;
Johnson, Luke J. ;
West, Simon C. .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 76 (09) :782-787
[4]  
Capra S W Jr, 1992, J Arthroplasty, V7, P247, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90044-Q
[5]   Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery - 10-year minimum follow-up period [J].
Cartier, P ;
Sanouiller, JL ;
Grelsamer, RP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (07) :782-788
[6]   Lateral tibiofemoral compartment narrowing after medial unicondylar arthroplasty [J].
Collier, Matthew B. ;
Eickmann, Thomas H. ;
Anbari, Kevin K. ;
Engh, Gerard A. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (464) :43-52
[7]   Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty [J].
Collier, Matthew B. ;
Eickmann, Thomas H. ;
Sukezaki, Fumio ;
McAuley, James P. ;
Engh, Gerard A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (06) :108-115
[8]  
Deshmukh RV, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P272
[9]  
Dorr LD, 2009, ORTHOPEDICS, V32
[10]   Implant position in knee surgery - A comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty [J].
Fisher, DA ;
Watts, M ;
Davis, KE .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (07) :2-8