Cost analysis for FGD units of coal-fired power plants: a case study in Turkey

被引:0
作者
Guney, Irfan [1 ]
Kilic, Osman [2 ]
Acarkan, Bora [3 ]
Ay, Selim [3 ]
机构
[1] Acibadem Univ, Fac Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Tech Educ, Elect Educ Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
ENERGY EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PART A-ENERGY SCIENCE AND RESEARCH | 2012年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Discounted cost; Escalation; Flue gas desulfurization; Limestone; Power plant; Rated interest; SO2; control; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; REDUCTION; POLLUTION; DISPATCH; SYSTEM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Electrical energy generation sector is expanding every year. Due to the increase in population and the developments in international interconnections, countries have started to consume and produce remarkable amounts of electricity. Coal-fired power plants take the highest share in electricity production. Therefore, emission reduction, especially for sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a must. Thermal power plants that use, domestic coal reserves with high sulfur content, must have Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) units. Sulfur dioxide emissions are reduced through FGD units, but this is an expensive process. FGD costs are generally analyzed on annual bases. This paper will introduce a new formulation for the hourly cost of a FGD unit, considering the fact that power plants' operational parameters might change on hourly bases. The followings are the parameters that might change on hourly bases; sulfur contents and calorific values of the coal arrived at the power plant in different lots, hourly energy sale rates and hourly loading rates. A novel cost analysis of the FGD unit is applied to the Orhaneli power plant (1x210 MW) and the results obtained by using four different discounting models are compared with the conventional annual cost analysis results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 994
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abbasoglu S, 2011, ENER EDUC SCI TECH-A, V28, P357
[2]  
Abboud N, 2005, INT J ENVIRON STUD, V7, P225
[3]   Environmental/economic power dispatch using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [J].
Abido, MA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (04) :1529-1537
[4]  
Alodali MFB, 2010, ENER EDUC SCI TECH-B, V2, P211
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Economic indicators.: Chemical engineering
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, RELIABILITY EVALUATI
[8]  
Arslan E, 2011, ENER EDUC SCI TECH-B, V3, P285
[9]   Coal-fired power generation: Proven technologies and pollution control systems [J].
Balat, M. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2008, 30 (02) :132-140
[10]  
Boward WL, 1998, PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN POWER CONFERENCE, VOL. 60, PTS I & II, P326