Parameter Optimization of Newly Developed Self-Propelled Variable Height Crop Sprayer Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Approach

被引:4
|
作者
Khan, Fraz Ahmad [1 ]
Ghafoor, Abdul [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad Azam [1 ]
Chattha, Muhammad Umer [2 ]
Kouhanestani, Farzaneh Khorsandi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Farm Machinery & Power, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[2] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
self-propelled sprayer; response surface methodology; forward speed; spray height; spray pressure; droplet density; coverage percentage; VMD; DEPOSITION; PESTICIDE; PRESSURE; EXPOSURE; NOZZLES; GUN;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture12030408
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The number of spray deposits plays an important role in effective and efficient spraying. The spraying equipment is one of the most significant factors that affect the number of spray deposits. Therefore, the study was focused on the parameter optimization of a newly developed self-propelled variable height crop sprayer. Response surface methodology (RSM) along with Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to study the effect of the independent variables (forward speed, spray height, and spray pressure) on response variables such as droplet density, coverage per-centage, and Volume Median Diameter (VMD). The experiment was conducted in the cotton field. Additionally, the RSM model was validated in this research. The results revealed that the coefficient of determination (R2) values was good for all response variables in the quadratic polynomial model. The optimized parameters were 6.5 km/h, 60 cm, 4 bar for fungicide application, and 8 km/h, 70 cm, 3 bar for insecticide and herbicide application. The predicted response variable values at the optimal conditions were 60.4 droplet/cm(2), 27%, 230 mu m for fungicides and 37.8 droplet/cm(2), 19.1%, 225.4 mu m for insecticide and herbicides application. The model validation is confirmed by the mean of actual response variable values at the optimal condition for insecticide and herbicides application, which was 41.35 +/- 3.67 droplet/cm(2), 21.10 +/- 1.72%, 227.43 +/- 1.22 mu m, and the prediction error was 8.46%, 9.2%, and 0.9% for droplet density, coverage percentage, and VMD, respectively. This study can provide support for further optimizing the parameters of the sprayer.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION OF EDM FOR Mg/SiCp COMPOSITE USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Ramasamy, V
    Rajkumar, M.
    Sundararaman, K. A.
    SURFACE REVIEW AND LETTERS, 2021, 28 (03)
  • [22] Process parameter optimization for instant pigeonpea dhal using response surface methodology
    Chakraborty, Subir Kumar
    Kumbhar, B. K.
    Sarkar, B. C.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2007, 81 (01) : 171 - 178
  • [23] Response Surface Methodology based Desirability Approach for Optimization of Roller Burnishing Process Parameter
    Patel K.A.
    Brahmbhatt P.K.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2018, 99 (6) : 729 - 736
  • [24] Optimization of a Confined Jet Geometry to Improve Film Cooling Performance Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
    Al-Hemyari, Mohammed
    Hamdan, Mohammad O.
    Orhan, Mehmet F.
    PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [25] Mixotrophic cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris for efficient wastewater treatment: optimization using response surface methodology (RSM)
    Wu, Wenjian
    Hu, Yisong
    Wang, Xiaochang C.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2019, 171 : 369 - 378
  • [26] Optimization of Chalcopyrite Galvanic Leaching in the Presence of Pyrite and Silver as Catalysts by using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
    Chehreghani, Sajjad
    Yari, Mojtaba
    Zeynali, Amir
    Akhgar, Behzad Nemati
    Gharehgheshlagh, Hojjat Hosseinzadeh
    Pishravian, Mahsa
    RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK, 2021, 36 (01): : 37 - 47
  • [27] Chloride removal from sewage using bismuth trioxide: Characterization and optimization by response surface methodology (RSM)
    Zhang, Liangjing
    Wang, Yu
    Liu, Yunlong
    Lv, Shucong
    Wang, Rui
    Hu, Xiaokun
    Liu, Yuchen
    Dong, Zhaojun
    Lin, Kuixuan
    Liu, Lusan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (05):
  • [28] Optimization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Kitchen Waste Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Reducing Sugar Production
    Jamaludin, Sharifah Iziuna Sayed
    Abd Kadir, Sharifah Aishah Syed
    Krishnan, Jagannathan
    Safri, Nurul Huda Mohamed
    2013 IEEE BUSINESS ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS COLLOQUIUM (BEIAC 2013), 2013, : 322 - 326
  • [29] Optimization and Analysis of Transparent Bamboo Performance Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Linear Analysis Method
    Shi, Ruisen
    Sheng, Xueru
    Jia, Haiyuan
    Zhang, Jian
    Li, Na
    Shi, Haiqiang
    Niu, Meihong
    Ping, Qingwei
    MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 307 (03)
  • [30] EXPLOITING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM) AS A NOVEL APPROACH FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF PHENOLICS AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF DATE PALM FRUIT
    Hachani, Soumaya
    Boukhalkhal, Sarah
    Ahmed, Ziyad Ben
    Harrat, Mohamed
    Silva, Artur M. S.
    Yousfi, Mohamed
    CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (04): : 572 - 582