Behavioral responses to weak electric fields and a lanthanide metal in two shark species

被引:39
作者
Jordan, Laura K. [1 ]
Mandelman, John W. [2 ]
Kajiura, Stephen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[2] New England Aquarium, Res Dept, Boston, MA 02110 USA
关键词
Bycatch; Deterrent; Elasmobranch; Electroreception; RARE-EARTH-METAL; SPINY DOGFISH; BYCATCH; ELECTRORECEPTION; DETERRENT; STINGRAY; GULF;
D O I
10.1016/j.jembe.2011.09.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The unintentional catch of sharks on hooks intended for other fishes is an economic, environmental and safety concern. Recent research has sought to repel sharks from baited hooks by applying various lanthanide metals and alloys to stimulate the elasmobranch electrosensory system. We present a simplified experimental methodology to test responses of two shark species to a single lanthanide metal. Behavioral responses to prey-simulating, weak electric fields were quantified to establish the sensitivity of the electrosensory system in Squalus acanthias (Linnaeus, 1758) and Mustelus canis (Mitchill, 1815). Both species detected electric fields <1 nV cm, and responded similarly to other elasmobranchs previously studied. Sharks were then presented with food affixed to treatments of acrylic, stainless steel or neodymium (Nd) metal. S. acanthias only fed in groups and fed from Nd significantly less frequently than from either control. M. canis was tested both individually and in groups and, when alone, fed less from Nd, however, in groups they fed significantly more often from Nd. These results confirm variability in response to a lanthanide metal both across species and within a species in the presence of competition. Since observed differences are not due to differences in sensitivity, other factors appear to influence behavioral responses and may compromise the effectiveness of lanthanide metals for the reduction of shark bycatch. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 350
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, FISHES ALASKA
[2]   Shifting baselines and the decline of pelagic sharks in the Gulf of Mexico [J].
Baum, JK ;
Myers, RA .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (02) :135-145
[3]   Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic [J].
Baum, JK ;
Myers, RA ;
Kehler, DG ;
Worm, B ;
Harley, SJ ;
Doherty, PA .
SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5605) :389-392
[4]  
Brill R, 2009, FISH B-NOAA, V107, P298
[5]  
Compagno L.J.V., 1984, FAO SPECIES CATA 1 2, V4
[6]  
Cornett AD, 2006, THESIS FLORIDA ATLAN
[7]  
Fordham S., 2006, SQUALUS ACANTHIAS IU
[8]   Shark interactions in pelagic longline fisheries [J].
Gilman, Eric ;
Clarke, Shelley ;
Brothers, Nigel ;
Alfaro-Shigueto, Joanna ;
Mandelman, John ;
Mangel, Jeff ;
Petersen, Samantha ;
Piovano, Susanna ;
Thomson, Nicola ;
Dalzell, Paul ;
Donoso, Miguel ;
Goren, Meidad ;
Werner, Tim .
MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (01) :1-18
[9]   Range of electrosensory detection of prey by Carcharhinus melanopterus and Himantura granulata [J].
Haine, OS ;
Ridd, PV ;
Rowe, RJ .
MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (03) :291-296
[10]   Managing by-catch and discards: how much progress are we making and how can we do better? [J].
Hall, SJ ;
Mainprize, BM .
FISH AND FISHERIES, 2005, 6 (02) :134-155