Genetics of traffic assignment models for strategic transport planning

被引:58
作者
Bliemer, Michiel C. J. [1 ]
Raadsen, Mark P. H. [1 ]
Brederode, Luuk J. N. [2 ,3 ]
Bell, Michael G. H. [1 ]
Wismans, Luc J. J. [2 ,4 ]
Smith, Mike J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Inst Transport & Logist Studies, Sch Business, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] DAT Mobil, Deventer, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Ctr Transport Studies, Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Univ York, Dept Math, York, N Yorkshire, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Traffic assignment; strategic transport planning; spatial assumptions; temporal assumptions; behavioural assumptions; fundamental diagram; model capabilities; DYNAMIC USER EQUILIBRIUM; CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL; KINEMATIC WAVES; NETWORK; FORMULATION; SIMULATION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2016.1207211
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper presents a review and classification of traffic assignment models for strategic transport planning purposes by using concepts analogous to genetics in biology. Traffic assignment models share the same theoretical framework (DNA), but differ in capability (genes). We argue that all traffic assignment models can be described by three genes. The first gene determines the spatial capability (unrestricted, capacity restrained, capacity constrained, and capacity and storage constrained) described by four spatial assumptions (shape of the fundamental diagram, capacity constraints, storage constraints, and turn flow restrictions). The second gene determines the temporal capability (static, semi-dynamic, and dynamic) described by three temporal assumptions (wave speeds, vehicle propagation speeds, and residual traffic transfer). The third gene determines the behavioural capability (all-or-nothing, one shot, and equilibrium) described by two behavioural assumptions (decision-making and travel time consideration). This classification provides a deeper understanding of the often implicit assumptions made in traffic assignment models described in the literature. It further allows for comparing different models in terms of functionality, and paves the way for developing novel traffic assignment models.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 78
页数:23
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Akamatsu Takashi., 1998, Infrastructure Planning Review, V15, P535, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2208/journalip.15.535, DOI 10.2208/JOURNALIP.15.535]
[2]  
Akcelik R., 1991, Australian Road Research, V21
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, TRAFFIC ENGIN CONTRO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1956, STUDIES EC TRANSPORT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Transportation systems analysis: models and applications
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1975, P 47 NAT ORSA TIMS N
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1998, P EUROPEAN TRANSPORT
[8]  
BELL MGH, 1995, TRANSPORTATION RES B, V29, P115, DOI DOI 10.1016/0191-2615(94)00030-4
[9]  
Bibbins J. R., 1935, HIGHWAY RES BOARD P, V14, P448
[10]  
Bliemer M. C. J., 2013, P AUSTR TRANSP RES F