CO2 emissions embodied in China-US trade: Input-output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio

被引:118
作者
Du, Huibin [2 ,3 ]
Guo, Jianghong [1 ]
Mao, Guozhu [1 ]
Smith, Alexander M. [4 ]
Wang, Xuxu [5 ]
Wang, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Inst Syst Engn, Sch Management, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
关键词
Input-output analysis; Emergy/dollar ratio; Structural decomposition analysis; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; CARBON CONTENT; FOREIGN-TRADE; ENERGY; DECOMPOSITION; POLLUTION; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.060
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To gain insight into changes in CO2 emissions embodied in China-US trade, an input-output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio (EDR) is used to estimate embodied CO2 emissions; a structural decomposition analysis (SDA) is employed to analyze the driving factors for changes in CO2 emissions embodied in China's exports to the US during 2002-2007. The results of the input-output analysis show that net export of CO2 emissions increased quickly from 2002 to 2005 but decreased from 2005 to 2007. These trends are due to a reduction in total CO2 emission intensity, a decrease in the exchange rate, and small imports of embodied CO(2)emissions. The results of the SDA demonstrate that total export volume was the largest driving factor for the increase in embodied CO2 emissions during 2002-2007, followed by intermediate input structure. Direct CO(2)emissions intensity had a negative effect on changes in embodied CO2 emissions. The results suggest that China should establish a framework for allocating emission responsibilities, enhance energy efficiency, and improve intermediate input structure. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5980 / 5987
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing energy-related CO2 emissions with sensitivity analysis and input-output techniques
    Angel Tarancon, Miguel
    Del Rio, Pablo
    ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 161 - 170
  • [22] Energy-related CO2 emissions and structural emissions' reduction in China's agriculture: An input-output perspective
    Yu, Yang
    Jiang, Tangyang
    Li, Shuangqi
    Li, Xiaolong
    Gao, Dingchao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276
  • [23] Net oil exports embodied in China's international trade: An input-output analysis
    Tang, Xu
    Zhang, Baosheng
    Feng, Lianyong
    Snowden, Simon
    Hook, Mikael
    ENERGY, 2012, 48 (01) : 464 - 471
  • [24] Recalculating CO2 emissions from the perspective of value-added trade: An input-output analysis of China's trade data
    Xu, Xueliu
    Mu, Mingjie
    Wang, Qian
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 : 158 - 166
  • [25] CO2 terms of trade and its determinants based on input-output models with technical differences
    Zhao, Guomei
    Xie, Rui
    Su, Bin
    Wang, Qunwei
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2025, 37 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [26] Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions for the industrial sector in Korea
    Na S.-I.
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2000, 3 (3) : 311 - 333
  • [27] Tracing CO2 emissions in China-US trade: A global value chain perspective
    Dai, Feng
    Yang, Jijun
    Guo, Hao
    Sun, Huaping
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 775
  • [28] CO2 emissions in the global supply chains of services: An analysis based on a multi-regional input-output model
    Zhang, Wencheng
    Peng, Shuijun
    Sun, Chuanwang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 : 93 - 103
  • [29] A subsystem input-output decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions in the service sectors: a case study of Beijing, China
    Yuan, Rong
    Zhao, Tao
    Xu, Jing
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 19 (06) : 2181 - 2198
  • [30] An input-output analysis of regional CO2 emissions from the service sector: an application to Liaoning Province of China
    Xia, Yanqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2012, 4 (02) : 187 - 214