Post-heat Treatment Effects on Cold-Sprayed Aluminum Coatings on AZ91D Magnesium Substrates

被引:21
作者
Bu, Hengyong [1 ]
Yandouzi, Mohammed [2 ]
Lu, Chen [1 ]
Jodoin, Bertrand [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Natl Engn Res Ctr Light Alloy Net Forming, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Mech Engn, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
aluminum coating; AZ91D magnesium; cold spray; intermetallic phases; post-heat treatment; shear strength; ALLOY; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11666-012-9785-7
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Commercially pure aluminum (CP-Al) powder was deposited by the cold spray process onto AZ91D magnesium (Mg) substrates that had been subjected to three different heat-treatment conditions: namely, as-cast (F), homogenized (T4), and artificially aged (T6). The substrate hardness was measured to be 80.7 +/- A 1.8, 73.7 +/- A 4.0, and 103.6 +/- A 7.4 HV0.025 for the F-, T4-, and T6-Mg alloy substrates respectively. Thick (similar to 400 mu m) and dense (below 1% porosity) Al coatings have been obtained. After post-deposition heat treatment at 400 A degrees C, the intermetallic Mg17Al12 (beta) and Al3Mg2 (gamma) phases with different thicknesses were found to have formed at the coating/substrate interface depending on the holding time. While no significant thickness differences of the intermetallic layers were detected in the cases of F- and T6-AZ91D substrates, thicker layers formed on the T4-AZ91D substrate. It is believed that the higher Al concentration in the T4-AZ91D solid solution within the alpha-Mg could diffuse and contribute more easily to the growth of the intermetallic phases. The hardness of the beta- and gamma-phase was measured to be 260.5 +/- A 10.7 HV0.025 and 279.6 +/- A 13.7 HV0.025, respectively. Shear strength test results revealed lower adhesion strength after heat treatment, which is attributed to the presence of brittle intermetallic layers at the coating/substrate interface.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 739
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys - a critical review [J].
Gray, JE ;
Luan, B .
JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS, 2002, 336 (1-2) :88-113
[12]  
HILLIS J, 1994, ASM HDB, V5, P819
[13]   Review on Cold Spray Process and Technology: Part I-Intellectual Property [J].
Irissou, Eric ;
Legoux, Jean-Gabriel ;
Ryabinin, Anatoly N. ;
Jodoin, Bertrand ;
Moreau, Christian .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 17 (04) :495-516
[14]   Effect of particle size, morphology, and hardness on cold gas dynamic sprayed aluminum alloy coatings [J].
Jodoin, B. ;
Ajdelsztajn, L. ;
Sansoucy, E. ;
Zuniga, A. ;
Richer, P. ;
Lavernia, E. J. .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 201 (06) :3422-3429
[15]   Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Low-Pressure Cold-Sprayed (LPCS) Coatings [J].
Koivuluoto, Heli ;
Lagerbom, Juha ;
Kylmalahti, Mikko ;
Vuoristo, Petri .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 17 (5-6) :721-727
[16]   Effect of gas pressure on Al coatings by cold gas dynamic spray [J].
Lee, H. ;
Shin, H. ;
Lee, S. ;
Ko, K. .
MATERIALS LETTERS, 2008, 62 (10-11) :1579-1581
[17]   Microstructural characteristics of cold-sprayed nanostructured WC-Co coatings [J].
Lima, RS ;
Karthikeyan, J ;
Kay, CM ;
Lindemann, J ;
Berndt, CC .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2002, 416 (1-2) :129-135
[18]   Magnesium - Properties - applications - potential [J].
Mordike, BL ;
Ebert, T .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2001, 302 (01) :37-45
[19]   Analysis of cold gas dynamically sprayed aluminium deposits [J].
Morgan, R ;
Fox, P ;
Pattison, J ;
Sutcliffe, C ;
O'Neill, W .
MATERIALS LETTERS, 2004, 58 (7-8) :1317-1320
[20]  
Murray J.L., 1982, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr., V3, P60, DOI [10.1007/BF02873413, DOI 10.1007/BF02873413]