Characterizing the microbiota of instrumentation in ophthalmology clinics during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:1
|
作者
Mahjoub, Heba [1 ]
Zhang, Sean X. [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jiangxia [4 ]
Memon, Warda [3 ]
Mostafa, Heba [5 ]
Breazzano, Mark P. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Hosp, Wilmer Eye Inst, Sch Med, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Div Med Microbiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Microbiol Lab, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Virol Lab, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[6] Retina Vitreous Surg Cent New York, Liverpool, NY 13088 USA
[7] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Instrumentation; Pathogens; Bacteria;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-022-05639-0
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose Increased ophthalmology-specific risk of novel coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission is well-established, increasing the fear of infection and causing associated decreased rates of procedures known to save vision. However, the potential transmission from exposure to clinic instrumentation is unknown, including which additional pathogens may be spreading in this context. This study seeks to fill this gap by characterizing the microbiota of instrumentation in ophthalmology clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic and identifying potential sources of pathogenic spread encountered by patients and healthcare workers. Methods Thirty-three samples were captured using standard cultures and media. Ten positive and negative controls were used to confirm proper technique. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all samples. Samples were collected from the retina (N=17), glaucoma (N= 6), cornea (N= 6), and resident (N=4) clinics with rigorous disinfection standards at a tertiary academic medical center. Standard media cultures and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for each sample. Results From 33 samples, more than half (17/33, 51.5%) yielded bacterial growth. Using two different molecular methods, three samples (3/33, 9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (cycle thresholds 36.48, 37.14, and 37.83). There was no significant difference in bacterial growth (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: - 0.644-0.358, p = 0.076) among different clinics (retina, glaucoma, cornea, resident). Staphylococcus (S.) epidermidis grew most frequently (12/35, 34%), followed by S. capitis (7/35, 20%), Micrococcus luteus (2/35, 5.7%), Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum (2/35, 5.7%), and Cutibacterium ([C.], Propionibacterium) acnes (2/35, 5.7%). C. acnes growth was more frequent with imaging device forehead rests (2/7, 28.6%) than other surfaces (0/26, 0%, 95% CI: 0.019-0.619, p = 0.040). No samples isolated fungus or adenovirus. Conclusions Most samples across subspecialty clinic instrumentation grew bacteria, and several tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Many isolated pathogens have been implicated in causing infections such as endophthalmitis, conjunctivitis, uveitis, and keratitis. The clinical implications of the ophthalmology microbiome for transmitting nosocomial infections warrant optimization of disinfection practices, strategies for mitigating spread, and additional study beyond the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:2585 / 2590
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterizing the microbiota of instrumentation in ophthalmology clinics during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
    Heba Mahjoub
    Sean X. Zhang
    Jiangxia Wang
    Warda Memon
    Heba Mostafa
    Mark P. Breazzano
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2022, 260 : 2585 - 2590
  • [2] New digital models of care in ophthalmology, during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
    Tham, Yih-Chung
    Husain, Rahat
    Teo, Kelvin Yi Chong
    Tan, Anna Cheng Sim
    Chew, Annabel Chee Yen
    Ting, Daniel S.
    Cheng, Ching-Yu
    Tan, Gavin Siew Wei
    Wong, Tien Yin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 106 (04) : 452 - 457
  • [3] Ophthalmology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Safadi, Khaled
    Kruger, Joshua M.
    Chowers, Itay
    Solomon, Abraham
    Amer, Radgonde
    Aweidah, Hamzah
    Frenkel, Shahar
    Mechoulam, Hadas
    Anteby, Irene
    Ben Eli, Hadas
    Lavy, Itay
    Jaouni, Tarek
    Landau, David
    Tiosano, Liran
    Greifner, Gabriel
    Ofir, Shay
    Vineberg, Tamar Levi
    Levy, Jaime
    BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01):
  • [4] COVID-19 Impact on Ophthalmology Clinics
    Loganathan, Megala
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [5] Academic Ophthalmology during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Wong, Tien Yin
    Bandello, Francesco
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 127 (08) : E51 - E52
  • [6] Ophthalmology practice in Afghanistan during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Delsoz, M.
    Hollands, P.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (06) : 2726 - 2729
  • [7] Optimising telemedicine in ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Patel, Shriji
    Hamdan, Saif
    Donahue, Sean
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2022, 28 (07) : 498 - 501
  • [8] The Status of Dysphagia Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Serel-Arslan, Selen
    Demir, Numan
    Belafsky, Peter Charles
    DYSPHAGIA, 2022, 37 (05) : 1258 - 1265
  • [9] Accessing hemodialysis clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Beaudet, Matthew
    Ravensbergen, Lea
    Deweese, James
    Beaubien-Souligny, William
    Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire
    Rios, Norka
    Caron, Marie-Line
    Suri, Rita S.
    El-Geneidy, Ahmed
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 13
  • [10] Virtual oncology clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic
    David O’Reilly
    Hailey Carroll
    Mairi Lucas
    Jane Sui
    Maha Al Sendi
    David McMahon
    Waseem Darwish
    Ronan McLaughlin
    Mohammed Raza Khan
    Hazel O Sullivan
    Sonya Chew
    Colum Dennehy
    Catherine M. Kelly
    John McCaffrey
    Megan Greally
    Desmond Carney
    Michaela J. Higgins
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2021, 190 : 1295 - 1301