A multi-stakeholder Framework for Ecological Risk Management: Summary of a SETAC technical workshop

被引:0
|
作者
Bachman, R
Barton, AL
Clark, JR
deFur, PL
Ells, SJ
Pittinger, CA
Slimak, MW
Stahl, RG
Wentsel, RS
机构
关键词
risk management; framework; stakeholders; ecological;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This summary outlines the Framework for Ecological Risk Management workshop sponsored by SETAC and administered by the SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education on 23-25 June 1997. This consensus framework describes a participative, decision-making, multi-stakeholder process, which closely complements the USEPA's (1992) model for ecological risk assessment by offering guidance on the substantive nature of interactions between risk assessors and risk managers, both preceding and following an ecological risk assessment. Workshop participants emphasized that ecological risk management (ERM) concerns should represent the diversity of stakeholder inputs, be considered early in the design of an ecological risk assessment (ERA), and optimally support sound decisionmaking. It was further recognized that sound and acceptable ERM decisions are supported by a process that effectively integrates social, political, economic, and technical interests and concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Municipal service delivery: A multi-stakeholder framework
    Messinger, Paul R.
    HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2013, 23 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [2] Multi-stakeholder perceptions of drought utilizing a conceptual framework for drought
    Lottering, S. J.
    Mafongoya, P.
    Lottering, R. T.
    SOUTH AFRICAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 105 (01) : 115 - 133
  • [3] From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study
    Porcari, Andrea
    Borsella, Elisabetta
    Benighaus, Christina
    Grieger, Khara
    Isigonis, Panagiotis
    Chakravarty, Somik
    Kines, Pete
    Jensen, Keld Alstrup
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (11)
  • [4] From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study
    Andrea Porcari
    Elisabetta Borsella
    Christina Benighaus
    Khara Grieger
    Panagiotis Isigonis
    Somik Chakravarty
    Pete Kines
    Keld Alstrup Jensen
    Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2019, 21
  • [5] Evaluating local multi-stakeholder platforms in forest management in Ontario
    Robson, Mark
    Hunt, Len M.
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2010, 86 (06) : 742 - 752
  • [6] Toward Multi-Stakeholder Value: Virtual Human Resource Management
    Suen, Hung-Yue
    Chang, Hsin-Lu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (12)
  • [7] Stakeholder engagement in food risk management: Evaluation of an iterated workshop approach
    Walls, John
    Rowe, Gene
    Frewer, Lynn
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (02) : 241 - 260
  • [8] A systematic literature review of conflict management in hospitality: Towards a multi-stakeholder resource-based conflict-management framework
    Wang, Ying
    Le, Truc H.
    Kwek, Anna
    Fu, Mengni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 123
  • [9] Multi-risk, multi-scale and multi-stakeholder – the contribution of a bow-tie analysis for risk management in the trilateral Wadden Sea Region
    Birgit Gerkensmeier
    Beate M. W. Ratter
    Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2018, 22 : 145 - 156
  • [10] Multi-risk, multi-scale and multi-stakeholder - the contribution of a bow-tie analysis for risk management in the trilateral Wadden Sea Region
    Gerkensmeier, Birgit
    Ratter, Beate M. W.
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 22 (01) : 145 - 156