Mechanisms of arsenate removal and membrane fouling in ferric based coprecipitation-low pressure membrane filtration systems

被引:22
作者
Ahmad, Arslan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rutten, Sam [3 ]
de Waal, Luuk [1 ]
Vollaard, Peter [4 ]
van Genuchten, Case [5 ,6 ]
Bruning, Harry [4 ]
Cornelissen, Emile [1 ]
van der Wal, Albert [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] KWR Water Cycle Res Inst, Groningenhaven 7, NL-3433 PE Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, KTH Int Groundwater Arsen Res Grp, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Technol, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Evides Water Co NV, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Geol Survey Denmark & Greenland GEUS, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Earth Sci Geochem, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Arsenic removal; Coprecipitation; Iron chloride; Groundwater treatment; Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration; AS(III) OXIDATION; ARSENITE REMOVAL; DRINKING-WATER; ADSORPTION; COAGULATION; MICROFILTRATION; FERRIHYDRITE; AERATION; KINETICS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116644
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Ferric based coprecipitation-low pressure membrane filtration is a promising arsenic (As) removal method, however, membrane fouling mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study we investigated the effect of feed water composition and membrane pore size on arsenate [As(V)] removal and membrane fouling. We observed that As removal efficiency was independent of the membrane pore size because the size of the Fe(III) particles was larger than the pore size of the membranes, attributed to a high calcium concentration in the feed water. Arsenic coprecipitation with Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides rapidly reached equilibrium before membrane filtration, within 1 min. Therefore, As removal efficiency was not improved by increasing residence time before membrane filtration. The removal of As(V) was strongly dependent on feed water composition. A higher Fe(III) dose was required to reduce As(V) to sub-mu g/L levels for feed water containing higher concentration of oxyanions such as phosphate and silicate, and lower concentration of cations such as calcium. Cake-layer formation was observed to be the predominant membrane fouling mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ahmad A., 2017, Best Practice Guide on the Control of Arsenic in Drinking Water, P79
[2]  
Ahmad A, 2019, MATER RES FOUND, V44, P1, DOI 10.21741/9781644900079-1
[3]   Arsenic in Drinking Water: Is 10 μg/L a Safe Limit? [J].
Ahmad, Arslan ;
Bhattacharya, Prosun .
CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2019, 5 (01) :1-3
[4]   Arsenite removal in groundwater treatment plants by sequential Permanganate-Ferric treatment [J].
Ahmad, Arslan ;
Cornelissen, Emile ;
van de Wetering, Stephan ;
van Dijk, Tim ;
van Genuchten, Case ;
Bundschuh, Jochen ;
van der Wal, Albert ;
Bhattacharya, Prosun .
JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 26 :221-229
[6]   Alternative methods for membrane filtration of arsenic from drinking water [J].
Brandhuber, P ;
Amy, G .
DESALINATION, 1998, 117 (1-3) :1-10
[7]   Modeling submerged hollow-fiber membrane filtration for wastewater treatment [J].
Busch, Jan ;
Cruse, Andreas ;
Marquardt, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 288 (1-2) :94-111
[8]   In-line coagulation with low-pressure membrane filtration [J].
Choi, KYJ ;
Dempsey, BA .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (19) :4271-4281
[9]   A Brief Review on the Resistance-in-Series Model in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) [J].
Di Bella, Gaetano ;
Di Trapani, Daniele .
MEMBRANES, 2019, 9 (02)
[10]   Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: Implications for arsenic mobility [J].
Dixit, S ;
Hering, JG .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (18) :4182-4189