Phenotypic resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from animals to antimicrobials

被引:0
作者
Ruzauskas, Modestas [1 ]
Suziedeliene, Edita [2 ]
Seputiene, Vaida [2 ]
Virgailis, Marius [1 ]
Siugzdiniene, Rita [1 ]
Daugelavicius, Rimantas [2 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Vet Acad, Vet Inst, Dept Microbiol & Food Safety, LT-56115 Kaisiadorys, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius State Univ, Fac Nat Sci, Dept Biochem & Biophys, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
VETERINARIJA IR ZOOTECHNIKA | 2007年 / 38卷 / 60期
关键词
antibiotics; antimicrobials; antimicrobial resistance; E; coli; multiresistance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aim of this study to isolate E. coli from animal origin and to determine resistance to antimicrobials. Clinical and pathological material from sick and dead animals was collected from different regions of Lithuania. Cattle, pigs and poultry were included in this study. As control E coli isolated from healthy animals was also tested. Disc diffusion method was used for antimicrobial testing according to CLSI standards. Ninety five strains of E. coli were tested for antimicrobial resistance. Sixty eight strains were isolated from sick and dead animals and 27 strains were tested as control. It was observed that no one antimicrobial was fully effective against all E. coli strains. The highest number of resistant strains had resistance patterns to tetracycline, ampicillin, cephalotin and trimetho/sulpha. Further, one third of tested E. coli were multiresistant, i.e. demonstrated resistance to not less than five antimicrobials from twelve tested. Strains that were isolated from sick and dead animals showed higher resistance compared to strains isolated from healthy animals. It should be mentioned that it is very important to select appropriate isolates of clinical importance, when susceptibility testing is performed, because in case of testing non pathogenic strains it could be obtained misleading results.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance among food animals: Principles and limitations [J].
Aarestrup, FM .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 51 (8-9) :380-388
[2]   Antimicrobial resistance:: an overview [J].
Acar, J ;
Röstel, B .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2001, 20 (03) :797-810
[3]  
BAGER F, 1999, DANMAP 98 CONSUMPTIO, P3
[4]   A European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility among zoonotic and commensal bacteria isolated from food-producing animals [J].
Bywater, R ;
Deluyker, H ;
Deroover, E ;
de Jong, A ;
Marion, H ;
McConville, M ;
Rowan, T ;
Shryock, T ;
Shuster, D ;
Thomas, V ;
Vallé, M ;
Walters, J .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 54 (04) :744-754
[5]  
*EER FOOD SAF AUTH, 2006, 2004 REP ZOONOSES ZO
[6]   Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C-coli:: Resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates [J].
Engberg, J ;
Aarestrup, FM ;
Taylor, DE ;
Gerner-Smidt, P ;
Nachamkin, I .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (01) :24-34
[7]  
MONNET DL, 2005, MONITORING ANTIMICRO
[8]   Quinolone resistance in potentially pathogenic and non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy ruminants [J].
Orden, JA ;
Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, JA ;
Cid, D ;
Díez, R ;
Martínez, S ;
de la Fuente, R .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 (03) :421-424
[9]  
Ruzauskas M, 2006, MED WETER, V62, P397
[10]  
RUZAUSKAS M, 2006, INT SCI C AN HLTH FO