Comparative Analysis of Wound-Field Flux-Switching Machines with Different Field and Armature Winding Configurations

被引:4
作者
Fereydoonian, Mostafa [1 ]
Lee, Kangbeen [1 ]
Bobba, Dheeraj [2 ]
Lee, Woongkul [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Powersys Solut Inc, Rochester Hills, MI USA
来源
2022 IEEE/AIAA TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT TECHNOLOGIES SYMPOSIUM (ITEC+EATS 2022) | 2022年
关键词
flux-switching machine; flux linkage; permanent magnet; toroidal; circumferential; power factor; power density;
D O I
10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813999
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Wound-field flux-switching (WFFS) machines have both field and armature windings in the stator, eliminating the need for permanent magnets in the rotor. This leads to a simple and robust electric machine design with variable flux operation capability. However, it is important to note that these two sets of windings (i.e., field and armature) need to be optimally placed within the limited stator geometry to maximize the power density and cooling capability. Since there are two amenable winding configurations (i.e., circumferential and toroidal) for the two winding sets, it will naturally generate a two-by-two matrix with four winding configurations for the WFFS machines. This paper will explore all four possible combinations of the field and armature windings to find the optimal WFFS machine design compared to a conventional permanent magnet flux-switching machine with an identical stack length and outer diameter. The electromagnetic performances, including flux linkage, back-emf, rated torque, and cogging torque, are analyzed and compared by 2D finite element analysis. The advantages and disadvantages of all the WFFS machine types are summarized considering cooling capability, power density, and manufacturing complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1081
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bin Sulaiman E, 2012, 2012 XXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES (ICEM), P1269, DOI 10.1109/ICElMach.2012.6350039
[2]   Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Machines: A Review of Opportunities and Challenges-Part I: Fundamentals and Topologies [J].
Chen, Hao ;
EL-Refaie, Ayman M. ;
Demerdash, Nabeel A. O. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2020, 35 (02) :684-698
[3]  
Hua, 2015, WILEY ENCY ELECT ELE, P1
[4]  
Koetsier J., 2021, US NEEDS 10X MORE RA
[5]  
Lindner A, 2014, IEEE IND ELEC, P869, DOI 10.1109/IECON.2014.7048603
[6]   Reduced Rare-Earth Flux-Switching Machines for Traction Applications [J].
Raminosoa, Tsarafidy ;
El-Refaie, Ayman M. ;
Pan, Di ;
Huh, Kum-Kang ;
Alexander, James P. ;
Grace, Kevin ;
Grubic, Stefan ;
Galioto, Steven ;
Reddy, Patel B. ;
Shen, Xiaochun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2015, 51 (04) :2959-2971
[7]  
Rauch S.E., 1955, Power Apparatus and Systems, V74, P1261
[8]  
Sarlioglu B, 2016, IEEE TRANSP EL C EXP
[9]   Flux-Switching Machine With DC Excitation [J].
Tang, Y. ;
Paulides, J. J. H. ;
Motoasca, T. E. ;
Lomonova, E. A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2012, 48 (11) :3583-3586
[10]   Multiphase Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Brushless Machine for Aerospace Application [J].
Thomas, Arwyn S. ;
Zhu, Z. Q. ;
Owen, Richard L. ;
Jewell, Geraint W. ;
Howe, David .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2009, 45 (06) :1971-1981