The efficacy of the systemic methotrexate treatment in caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A quantitative review of English literature

被引:36
作者
Bodur, S. [1 ]
Ozdamar, O. [2 ]
Kilic, S. [4 ]
Gun, I. [3 ]
机构
[1] GATA Med Fac, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Golcuk Mil Hosp, TR-41650 Golcuk, Kocaeli, Turkey
[3] GATA Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] GATA Med Fac, Dept Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy; methotrexate; prognostic factors; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; SECTION SCAR; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CASE SERIES; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3109/01443615.2014.954101
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To determine the efficacy and safety of primary medical treatment with systemic methotrexate (MTX) in caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, we conducted a Medline/PubMed search on the relevant English literature from January 1978 to January 2012. The search yielded 27 publications of 40 cases of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. The literature search showed a very liberal use of systemic MTX treatment with unfavourable outcomes, although the major determinant of the clinical efficacy was found in here to be beta-hCG level together with embryonic cardiac activity (ECA) status. A caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy presented with a serum beta-hCG concentration of <= 12,000 mIU/ml (odds ratio, OR 5.68, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.37-23.48) and absence of ECA (OR 4.80, 95% CI, 1.14-20.08) was found to be associated with higher efficacy rate of primary systemic MTX treatment. Administration of primary systemic MTX treatment was found to be ideal for a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy presented before 8 weeks' gestation, with a beta-hCG concentration of <= 12,000 mIU/ml together with an absent ECA (OR 14.52, 95% CI, 2.36-89.09).
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Prognostic factors for an unsatisfactory primary methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy: a quantitative review [J].
Hung, TH ;
Shau, WY ;
Hsieh, TT ;
Hsu, JJ ;
Soong, YK ;
Jeng, CJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (09) :2636-2642
[22]   Conservative treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy with transvaginal needle aspiration of the embryo [J].
Hwu, YM ;
Hsu, CY ;
Yang, HY .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (06) :841-842
[23]   Cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Jurkovic, D ;
Hillaby, K ;
Woelfer, B ;
Lawrence, A ;
Salim, R ;
Elson, CJ .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) :310-310
[24]   The nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy [J].
Kirk, Emma ;
Bourne, Tom .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 18 (06) :587-593
[25]   Unsuccessful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with systemic methotrexate: a report of two cases [J].
Lam, PM ;
Lo, KWK ;
Lau, TK .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (01) :108-111
[26]   Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Li, Chunhai ;
Li, Caixia ;
Feng, Danjun ;
Jia, Chunling ;
Liu, Bin ;
Zhan, Xinfeng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 113 (03) :178-182
[27]   Cesarean Delivery Scar Ectopic Pregnancy [J].
Little, Elizabeth A. ;
Moussavian, Bahar ;
Horrow, Mindy M. .
ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2010, 26 (02) :107-109
[28]   Intramural pregnancy embedded in a previous Cesarean section scar treated conservatively [J].
Marchiolé, P ;
Gorlero, F ;
De Caro, G ;
Podestà, M ;
Valenzano, M .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 23 (03) :307-309
[29]   Ectopic pregnancies in a Caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication [J].
Maymon, R ;
Halperin, R ;
Mendlovic, S ;
Schneider, D ;
Herman, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2004, 10 (06) :515-523
[30]   Ectopic pregnancies in Caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre [J].
Maymon, R ;
Halperin, R ;
Mendlovic, S ;
Schneider, D ;
Vaknin, Z ;
Herman, A ;
Pansky, M .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (02) :278-284