Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:73
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography in Axial Length Measurement for Advanced Cataract Patients
    Chirapapaisan, Chareenun
    Srivannaboon, Sabong
    Chonpimai, Pratuangsri
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2020, 97 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [42] Clinical Evaluation of a New Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer
    Alio, Jorge L.
    Jose-Martinez, Marina
    Martinez-Abad, Antonio
    Rodriguez, Alejandra E.
    Versaci, Francesco
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    Murta, Joaquim Neto
    Plaza-Puche, Ana B.
    Canto-Cerdan, Mario
    Pinero, David P.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (05)
  • [43] Analysis of cracks and damages in optical elements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography technique
    Munoz Moreno, Gilberto
    Alcala Ochoa, Noe
    22ND CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR OPTICS: LIGHT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD, 2011, 8011
  • [44] Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer
    Shammas, H. John
    Ortiz, Sergio
    Shammas, Maya C.
    Kim, Seong Hwan
    Chong, Changho
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01) : 50 - 61
  • [45] Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometry: A Comprehensive Overview
    Borgia, Alfredo
    Raimondi, Raffaele
    Sorrentino, Tania
    Santoru, Francesco
    Buzzi, Matilde
    Borgia, Vittorio
    Scorcia, Vincenzo
    Giannaccare, Giuseppe
    PHOTONICS, 2022, 9 (12)
  • [46] Differences Between Keratometry and Total Keratometry Measurements in a Large Dataset Obtained With a Modern Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer
    Wendelstein, Jascha A.
    Hoffmann, Peter C.
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Langenbucher, Achim
    Findl, Oliver
    Ruiss, Manuel
    Bolz, Matthias
    Riaz, Kamran M.
    Pantanelli, Seth M.
    Debellemaniere, Guillaume
    Gatinel, Damien
    Cooke, David L.
    Galzignato, Alice
    Yeo, Tun kuan
    Seiler, Theo G.
    Zinkernagel, Martin
    Savini, Giacomo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 260 : 102 - 114
  • [47] Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices
    Fisus, Andreea D.
    Hirnschall, Nino D.
    Findl, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [48] Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer
    Kanclerz, Piotr
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Rozema, Jos J.
    Przewlocka, Katarzyna
    Savini, Giacomo
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (11) : 1619 - 1624
  • [49] Simultaneous Topography and Tomography of Microstructures using Full-field Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography
    Anna, Tulsi
    Shakher, Chandra
    Mehta, Dalip Singh
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED PHASE MEASUREMENT METHODS IN OPTICS AN IMAGING, 2010, 1236 : 155 - 160
  • [50] Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers
    Sabatino, Francesco
    Matarazzo, Francesco
    Findl, Oliver
    Maurino, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (08) : 1124 - 1129