Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:73
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a new dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer
    Yu, Jinjin
    Lin, Xuanqiao
    Huang, Xiaomin
    Xu, Zhenyu
    Ning, Rui
    Li, Kexin
    Savini, Giacomo
    Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico
    Zhou, Xingtao
    Huang, Jinhai
    EYE AND VISION, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [32] Comparison of composite and segmental methods for acquiring optical axial length with swept-source optical coherence tomography
    Goto, So
    Maeda, Naoyuki
    Noda, Toru
    Ohnuma, Kazuhiko
    Koh, Shizuka
    Iehisa, Ikko
    Nishida, Kohji
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [33] Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry Devices in Dense Cataracts
    Vasavada, Shail A.
    Patel, Priyanka
    Vaishnav, Vineet R.
    Ashena, Zahra
    Srivastava, Samaresh
    Vasavada, Vaishali
    Nanavaty, Mayank A.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (08) : 557 - 564
  • [34] Axial length adjustment in eyes with silicone oil endotamponade reduces overestimation by a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer
    Kaiser, Klemens Paul
    Jandewerth, Tyll
    Bucur, Julian
    Kohnen, Thomas
    Lwowski, Christoph
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 52 (08) : 833 - 839
  • [35] Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients
    Tamaoki, Akeno
    Kojima, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Asato
    Yamamoto, Mana
    Kaga, Tatsushi
    Tanaka, Kiyoshi
    Ichikawa, Kazuo
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [36] Laser Lens Size Measurement Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
    Jia, Pingping
    Zhao, Hong
    Qin, Yuwei
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (14):
  • [37] Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry
    Tana-Sanz, Pedro
    Rodriguez-Carrillo, Maria Dolores
    Ruiz-Santos, Maria
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    Ruiz-Mesa, Ramon
    Tana-Rivero, Pedro
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (12) : 1219 - 1234
  • [38] Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients
    Chan, Tommy C. Y.
    Wan, Kelvin H.
    Tang, Fang Yao
    Wang, Yu Meng
    Yu, Marco
    Cheung, Carol
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 46 (01): : 35 - 45
  • [39] Accuracy of Predicting Refractive Outcomes Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography in Nuclear Cataracts
    An, Youngju
    Kim, Hyojin
    Joo, Choun-Ki
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 60 (11): : 1043 - 1049
  • [40] Refractive Predictability of Two Intraocular Lens Power Formulas in Long, Medium, and Short Eyes Using a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer
    Blehm, Clayton
    Balest, Zach
    Blehm, Ashton C.
    Hall, Brad
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 18 : 2531 - 2537