Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:73
|
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
    Gao, Rongrong
    Chen, Hao
    Savini, Giacomo
    Miao, Yaxin
    Wang, Xiaorui
    Yang, Jing
    Zhao, Weiqi
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [22] Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer
    Ruiz-Mesa, Ramon
    Abengozar-Vela, Antonio
    Ruiz-Santos, Maria
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (11) : 1406 - 1412
  • [23] Comparison of Ocular Biometric Measurements Using New Swept-source Optical-coherence Tomography, Low-coherence Reflectometry, A-Scan Biometry, and Autokeratometry
    Cho, Jae Jin
    Bae, Gi Hyun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 64 (04): : 287 - 295
  • [24] Evaluation of Axial Length Measurement Using Enhanced Retina Visualization Mode of the Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Dense Cataract
    Tamaoki, Akeno
    Kojima, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Asato
    Yamamoto, Mana
    Kaga, Tatsushi
    Tanaka, Kiyoshi
    Ichikawa, Kazuo
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2021, 64 (04) : 595 - 603
  • [25] Axial length measurement and detection rates using a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer in the presence of a dense vitreous hemorrhage
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Yingying
    Gao, Rongrong
    Chen, Hao
    Song, Benhao
    Tu, Ruixue
    Zhao, Yune
    McAlinden, Colm
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (03) : 360 - 364
  • [26] Evaluation of a New All-in-One Optical Biometer and Comparison With a Validated Swept-source OCT Biometer
    Li, Yue
    Zou, Zhilin
    Xu, Shuoyu
    Yu, Jinjin
    Ye, Qianfang
    Li, Kexin
    Xiao, Yichen
    Savini, Giacomo
    Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico
    Zhou, Xingtao
    Yao, Mingyu
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 39 (12) : 825 - 830
  • [27] Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer as Screening Strategy for Macular Disease in Patients Scheduled for Cataract Surgery
    Tognetto, Daniele
    Pastore, Marco R.
    De Giacinto, Chiara
    Merli, Riccardo
    Franzon, Marco
    D'Aloisio, Rossella
    Belfanti, Lorenzo
    Giglio, Rosa
    Cirigliano, Gabriella
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [28] Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    Pastor-Pascual, Francisco
    Ruiz-Mesa, Ramon
    Tana-Rivero, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (06) : 802 - 814
  • [29] Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry
    Guler, Emre
    Kulak, Ali Ender
    Totan, Yuksel
    Yuvarlak, Armagan
    Hepsen, Ibrahim Feyzi
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2016, 39 (05) : 336 - 341
  • [30] Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography
    Wang, Wenwen
    Miao, Yaxin
    Savini, Giacomo
    McAlinden, Colm
    Chen, Hao
    Hu, Qingjie
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7