Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:74
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length [J].
Hoffer, Kenneth J. ;
Shammas, H. John ;
Savini, Giacomo .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (04) :644-648
[12]  
HOFFER KJ, 1994, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V20, P677
[13]   Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula [J].
Hoffer, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (08) :1233-1237
[15]  
Hoffer KJ, 2014, MULTICENTER PR UNPUB
[16]   A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24
[17]   Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements [J].
Holzer, M. P. ;
Mamusa, M. ;
Auffarth, G. U. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (06) :807-810
[18]   Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster [J].
Huang, Jinhai ;
Savini, Giacomo ;
Li, Jian ;
Lu, Weicong ;
Wu, Fan ;
Wang, Jing ;
Li, Yaolin ;
Feng, Yifan ;
Wang, Qinmei .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (09) :1277-1281
[19]  
Lyle WA, 1996, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V22, P1456
[20]   Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer [J].
Mandal, Priyanka ;
Berrow, Emma J. ;
Naroo, Shehzad A. ;
Wolffsohn, James S. ;
Uthoff, Detlef ;
Holland, Detlef ;
Shah, Sunil .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (02) :256-258