Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:74
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Akman A, 2015, BR J OPHTHALMOL
[2]   Comparison of predictions made by the Intraocular Lens Master and ultrasound biometry [J].
Bhatt, Anand B. ;
Schefler, Amy C. ;
Feuer, William J. ;
Yoo, Sonia H. ;
Murray, Timothy G. .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 126 (07) :929-933
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients [J].
Buckhurst, P. J. ;
Wolffsohn, J. S. ;
Shah, S. ;
Naroo, S. A. ;
Davies, L. N. ;
Berrow, E. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (07) :949-953
[5]  
C. User Group for Laser Interference Biometry, OPT IOL CONST ZEISS
[6]   Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients [J].
Goebels, Susanne ;
Pattmoeller, Max ;
Eppig, Timo ;
Cayless, Alan ;
Seitz, Berthold ;
Langenbucher, Achim .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (11) :2387-2393
[7]   Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis [J].
Haigis, W ;
Lege, B ;
Miller, N ;
Schneider, B .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (09) :765-773
[8]  
Hoffer KJ, 2007, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V33, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.054
[9]   Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China [J].
Hoffer, Kenneth J. ;
Shammas, H. John ;
Savini, Giacomo ;
Huang, Jinhai .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01) :62-67
[10]   Protocols for Studies of Intraocular Lens Formula Accuracy [J].
Hoffer, Kenneth J. ;
Aramberri, Jaime ;
Haigis, Wolfgang ;
Olsen, Thomas ;
Savini, Giacomo ;
Shammas, H. John ;
Bentow, Stanley .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 160 (03) :403-405