共 50 条
Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective whale optimization of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell and energy storage system using liquefied natural gas cold energy
被引:11
作者:
Wu, Jingjing
[1
]
Pan, Zhen
[1
]
Binama, Maxime
[1
]
Shang, Liyan
[2
]
Zhou, Li
[3
]
机构:
[1] Liaoning Petrochem Univ, Coll Petr Engn, Fushun 113001, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Petrochem Univ, Coll Environm & Safety Engn, Fushun, Peoples R China
[3] Liaoning Petrochem Univ, Coll Chem Engn, Fushun, Peoples R China
关键词:
compressed air energy storage;
LNG cold energy;
multi-objective whale optimization;
solid oxide fuel cell;
waste heat recovery;
ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE;
CCHP SYSTEM;
THERMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE;
POWER-SYSTEM;
CAES SYSTEM;
TURBINE;
ORC;
EFFICIENT;
DESIGN;
D O I:
10.1002/er.8727
中图分类号:
TE [石油、天然气工业];
TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号:
0807 ;
0820 ;
摘要:
A multigeneration system comprising solid oxide fuel cell, compressed air energy storage, gas turbine, supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle (S-CO2), and organic flash Rankine cycle (OFRC) based on liquefied natural gas cold energy is proposed. The system integrates peak shaving, heating, cooling, power generation, and energy storage, solving the imbalance between the supply and demand of renewable energy. It is comprehensively analyzed from the thermodynamic, economic, and exergoeconomic perspectives to evaluate the performance of the three phases (full time, charging period, and discharging period). The evaluation shows that the exergy analysis of the multigeneration system alone is not comprehensive, and the exergoeconomic analysis is more necessary. Additionally, the S-CO2 coupled with the OFRC generates power in a more efficient way than the S-CO2 coupled with the Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) or Organic Flash cycle (OFC) does. Finally, the NSGA-II and multi-objective whale algorithms are employed to optimize the system. The results show that the multi-objective whale algorithm is slightly better than the NSGA-II. Moreover, the optimized round-trip efficiency (RTE) and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) are 68.64% and 0.053 $ kWh(-1), respectively. Compared with the base design point, the RTE improves by 1.93%, and the LCOE decreases by 3.64%.
引用
收藏
页码:24208 / 24228
页数:21
相关论文