A twelve-year study of the prevalence, risk factors and characteristics of interval colorectal cancers after negative colonoscopy

被引:5
作者
Jennings, Paul [1 ]
Seigneurin, Arnaud [2 ]
Delafosse, Patricia [2 ]
Baysson, Helene [3 ]
Exbrayat, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Off Lutte Canc, F-38240 Meylan, France
[2] CHU Grenoble, Registre Canc Isere, Pavil E,BP 217, F-38043 Grenoble 9, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Annecy Genevois, F-74370 Metz, France
关键词
Colorectal Cancer; Population Screening Programme; Interval cancer; Guaiac Faecal Occult Blood Test; Colonoscopy; Diagnosis; QUALITY; CARCINOMAS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; RATES; FLAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinre.2019.06.001
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The objective of our study was to describe and analyse the Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers (PCCRCs) and endoscopist performance-related risk factors in the Isere regional screening programme. Method: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study between 2002-2013, where Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers (PCCRCs) were defined as colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between six and sixty months post-colonoscopy following a positive gFOBT. We analysed the endoscopist performance-related risk factors of the 62 gastroenterologists who had carried Diagnosis out at least 30 colonoscopies during this period. Results: During the period reviewed, there were 10,557 negative colonoscopies performed. Fifteen post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers were diagnosed from 2002-2013 with an average patient age of 67.1 years. Men comprised 73% of the cases and 53% of all the cases were found in the distal colon. These 15 cases comprised 1.1% of all Colorectal Cancers (CRCs) diagnosed in the screening programme, with an incidence rate of 0.42 (0.21-0.77) per 1,000 person-years. The aetiological breakdown was as follows: 47% related to missed cancers, 27% were new cancers, 20% were faded biopsy detection, and 6% related to incomplete removal. The Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) among gastroenterologists was an average of 30%, but large heterogeneity was present within this number, ranging from 11% to 49%. Conclusion: The post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer prevalence and incident rate were low relative to the literature. However, significant heterogeneity was present in the adenoma detection rate. Decreasing this heterogeneity by establishing a national benchmark, regular performance feedback and training modules should homogenise adenoma detection rates and decrease the number of interval cancers in the region. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [2] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, CANC INCIDENCE MORTA
  • [4] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [5] Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program
    Brenner, Hermann
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Kretschmann, Jens
    Roesch, Thomas
    Pox, Christian
    Stock, Christian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 149 (02) : 356 - +
  • [6] Natural History of Colorectal Adenomas: Birth Cohort Analysis Among 3.6 Million Participants of Screening Colonoscopy
    Brenner, Hermann
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Stock, Christian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2013, 22 (06) : 1043 - 1051
  • [7] Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study
    Brenner, Hermann
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. GUT, 2012, 61 (11) : 1576 - 1582
  • [8] Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: A population-based analysis
    Bressler, Brian
    Paszat, Lawrence F.
    Chen, Zhongliang
    Rothwell, Deanna M.
    Vinden, Chris
    Rabeneck, Linda
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [9] Phenotype of microsatellite-stable colorectal carcinomas with CpG island methylation
    Chirieac, LR
    Shen, LL
    Catalano, PJ
    Issa, JP
    Hamilton, SR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (04) : 429 - 436
  • [10] Chutkan Robynne, 2006, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V16, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.giec.2006.01.005