Audit Culture: Unintended Consequences of Accountability Practices in Evidence-Based Programs

被引:12
作者
Owczarzak, Jill [1 ]
Broaddus, Michelle [2 ]
Pinkerton, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, 624 N Broadway,Hampton House Room 739, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr AIDS Intervent Res, Dept Psychiat & Behav Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
audit culture; evidence-based programs; HIV prevention; community-based organizations; HIV PREVENTION; BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS; EVALUATION SYSTEM; IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONS; DIFFUSION; PROJECT; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/1098214015603502
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Evaluation has become expected within the nonprofit sector, including HIV prevention service delivery through community-based organizations (CBOs). While staff and directors at CBOs may acknowledge the potential contribution of evaluation data to the improvement of agency services, the results of evaluation are often used to demonstrate fiscal prudence, efficiency, and accountability to funders and the public, rather than to produce information for the organization's benefit. We conducted 22 in-depth, semistructured interviews with service providers from four agencies implementing the same evidence-based HIV prevention intervention. We use the lens of "audit culture'' to understand how the evaluation and accountability mandates of evidence-based program implementation within HIV prevention service provision affect provider-client relations, staff members' daily work, and organizational focus in natural settings, or contexts without continuous support and implementation monitoring. We conclude with recommendations for improving the use and methods of evaluation within HIV prevention service delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 343
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing? [J].
Kipnis, Andrew B. .
AMERICAN ETHNOLOGIST, 2008, 35 (02) :275-289
[22]  
Lincoln Y. S., 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, DOI DOI 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
[23]   Best-evidence interventions: Findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000-2004 [J].
Lyles, Cynthia M. ;
Kay, Linda S. ;
Crepaz, Nicole ;
Herbst, Jeffrey H. ;
Passin, Warren F. ;
Kim, Angela S. ;
Rama, Sima M. ;
Thadiparthi, Sekhar ;
DeLuca, Julia B. ;
Mullins, Mary M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 97 (01) :133-143
[24]  
Miles MB, 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook, VThird
[25]  
Miller R., 2000, J PREVENTION INTERVE, V19, P23
[26]   Evaluation barriers and facilitators among community-based HIV prevention programs [J].
Napp, D ;
Gibbs, D ;
Jolly, D ;
Westover, B ;
Uhl, G .
AIDS EDUCATION AND PREVENTION, 2002, 14 (03) :38-48
[27]   Major factors influencing HIV/AIDS project evaluation [J].
Niba, MB ;
Green, JM .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 2005, 29 (04) :313-330
[28]   Collaborative evaluations: A step-by-step model for the evaluator [J].
O'Sullivan, Rita .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2007, 28 (03) :381-382
[29]  
Oldani Michael J, 2010, Anthropol Med, V17, P215, DOI 10.1080/13648470.2010.493649
[30]   A Learning Approach to Monitoring and Evaluation [J].
Oswald, Katy ;
Taylor, Peter .
IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2010, 41 (06) :114-120