The CHull procedure for selecting among multilevel component solutions

被引:31
作者
Ceulemans, Eva [1 ]
Timmerman, Marieke E. [2 ]
Kiers, Henk A. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Educ Sci, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Model selection; Multilevel component analysis; Number of free parameters; Degrees of freedom; Numerical convex hull based procedure; MODEL SELECTION; COMPLEXITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.08.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently, Timmerman [1] proposed a class of multilevel component models for the analysis of two-level multivariate data. These models consist of a separate component model for each level in the data. Specifically, the between-differences are captured by a between-component model and the within-differences by a within-component model. Within the class of multilevel component models a number of variants can be distinguished. These variants differ with respect to the within-component model, in that different sets of restrictions are imposed on the within-component loadings and on the variances and correlations of the within-component scores. The following question then may be raised: given a specific two-level data set, which of the multilevel component model variants should be selected, and with how many between- and within-components? We address this question by proposing a model selection procedure that builds on the CHull heuristic of Ceulemans and Kiers [2,3]. The results of an extensive simulation study show that the proposed CHull heuristic succeeds very well in assessing the number of between- and within-components. Tracing the underlying multilevel component model variant is more difficult: Whereas differences in within-loading matrices and differences in variances are very easy to detect, the precise correlational structure of the within-components is much harder to capture. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Experimental design-procedures for the behavioral Sciences
[2]   Multi-way models for sensory profiling data [J].
Bro, Rasmus ;
Qannari, El Mostafa ;
Kiers, Henk A. L. ;
Naes, Tormod ;
Frost, Michael Bom .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2008, 22 (1-2) :36-45
[3]   ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING VIA AN N-WAY GENERALIZATION OF ECKART-YOUNG DECOMPOSITION [J].
CARROLL, JD ;
CHANG, JJ .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1970, 35 (03) :283-&
[4]  
Cattell RaymondB., 1988, HDB MULTIVARIATE EXP, V2nd, P131, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_4
[5]   Hierarchical classes models for three-way three-mode binary data: Interrelations and model selection [J].
Ceulemans, E ;
Van Mechelen, I .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2005, 70 (03) :461-480
[6]   Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: A numerical convex hull based method [J].
Ceulemans, E ;
Kiers, HAL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 59 :133-150
[7]   Discriminating between strong and weak structures in three-mode principal component analysis [J].
Ceulemans, Eva ;
Kiers, Henk A. L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 :601-620
[8]   Multilevel component analysis and multilevel PLS of chemical process data [J].
de Noord, OE ;
Theobald, EH .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2005, 19 (5-7) :301-307
[9]   Degrees of freedom for the residuals of a principal component analysis - A clarification [J].
Faber, Nicolaas M. .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2008, 93 (01) :80-86
[10]   MODEL SELECTION AND VALIDATION FOR YIELD TRIALS WITH INTERACTION [J].
GAUCH, HG .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :705-715