Robot-Guided Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Central Neuropathic Pain

被引:41
作者
Quesada, Charles [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pommier, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fauchon, Camille [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, Claire [5 ]
Creac'h, Christelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Vassal, Francois [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Peyron, Roland [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon1, Inserm 01028, NEUROPAIN Team, St Etienne, France
[2] Univ Jean Monnet, St Etienne, France
[3] CHU St Etienne, Ctr Stephanois Douleur, Hop Nord, St Etienne, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Reg Univ St Etienne, Serv Neurochirurg, Hop Nord, St Etienne, France
[5] Univ Queensland, Queensland Brain Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Ctr Hosp Reg Univ St Etienne, Hop Nord, Serv Neurol, St Etienne, France
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2018年 / 99卷 / 11期
关键词
Motor cortex; Neuropathic pain; Rehabilitation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; MOTOR CORTEX; RATING-SCALE; RELIEF SCALE; EXCITABILITY; GUIDELINES; ETIOLOGY; SESSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.013
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To confirm and extend previous results involving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) aimed at alleviating refractory central neuropathic pain (CNP). To evaluate pain relief in detail and to assess ongoing benefits after one year of treatment. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: University hospital. Outpatient settings. Participants: Patients (N=80) with chronic central pain after brain or spinal cord injuries. Interventions: High-frequency (20Hz) neuronavigated-rTMS sessions were applied on the primary motor cortex using a figure-of-eight coil positioned by a robotized arm. Patients received a minimum of 4 consecutive sessions, each separated by 3-4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of pain relief (%R), duration of pain relief (DPR), numeric rating scale (NRS), neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI), and pain relief score (PRS). Results: Seventy-one patients completed the study. On average, after the first 4 sessions, %R was 28% and DPR was 11 days. Fifty-four patients (76%) were responders with a permissive threshold of >= 10%R and 61% (43 patients) with a stringent threshold >= 30%R. After 12 months of treatment (15 sessions) we observed a cumulative effect on %R (48%), DPR (20d), and on the prevailing NPSI sub-score (-28%). This effect reached significance after 4 sessions and was further maintained over 12 months. Across participants, more than 1000 rTMS sessions were delivered over 6 years without any adverse effect. Conclusion: These results confirm that multiple rTMS sessions are both safe and have potential as a treatment for CNP. An ongoing randomized controlled trial will allow teasing out of this effect from placebo analgesia. (C) 2018 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:2203 / 2215
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] INCIDENCE OF CENTRAL POSTSTROKE PAIN
    ANDERSEN, G
    VESTERGAARD, K
    INGEMANNIELSEN, M
    JENSEN, TS
    [J]. PAIN, 1995, 61 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [2] Pain relief by rTMS:: Differential effect of current flow but no specific action on pain subtypes
    Andre-Obadia, N.
    Mertens, P.
    Gueguen, A.
    Peyron, R.
    Garcia-Larrea, L.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2008, 71 (11) : 833 - 840
  • [3] On the importance of placebo timing in rTMS studies for pain relief
    Andre-Obadia, Nathalie
    Magnin, Michel
    Garcia-Larrea, Luis
    [J]. PAIN, 2011, 152 (06) : 1233 - 1237
  • [4] Neuropathic pain: Are there distinct subtypes depending on the aetiology or anatomical lesion?
    Attal, N.
    Fermanian, C.
    Fermanian, J.
    Lanteri-Minet, M.
    Alchaar, H.
    Bouhassira, D.
    [J]. PAIN, 2008, 138 (02) : 343 - 353
  • [5] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy: a randomized sham-controlled comparative study
    Attal, Nadine
    Ayache, Samar S.
    De Andrade, Daniel Ciampi
    Mhalla, Alaa
    Baudic, Sophie
    Jazat, Frederique
    Ahdab, Rechdi
    Neves, Danusa O.
    Sorel, Marc
    Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
    Bouhassira, Didier
    [J]. PAIN, 2016, 157 (06) : 1224 - 1231
  • [6] The specific disease burden of neuropathic pain: Results of a French nationwide survey
    Attal, Nadine
    Lanteri-Minet, Michel
    Laurent, Bernard
    Fermanian, Jacques
    Bouhassira, Didier
    [J]. PAIN, 2011, 152 (12) : 2836 - 2843
  • [7] Development and validation of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory
    Bouhassira, D
    Attal, N
    Fermanian, J
    Alchaar, H
    Gautron, M
    Masquelier, E
    Rostaing, S
    Lanteri-Minet, M
    Collin, E
    Grisart, J
    Boureau, F
    [J]. PAIN, 2004, 108 (03) : 248 - 257
  • [8] ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE
    CARLSSON, AM
    [J]. PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) : 87 - 101
  • [9] RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EXPERTS ON INTRA-ABDOMINAL HYPERTENSION AND ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME
    De Waele, J. J.
    Cheatham, M. L.
    Malbrain, M. L. N. G.
    Kirkpatrick, A. W.
    Sugrue, M.
    Balogh, Z.
    Ivatury, R.
    De Keulenaer, B.
    Kimball, E. J.
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2009, 64 (03) : 203 - 209
  • [10] Central post-stroke pain
    Demasles, S.
    Peyron, R.
    Larrea, L. Garcia
    Laurent, B.
    [J]. REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2008, 164 (10) : 825 - 831