Efficacy and safety of insulin in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:44
作者
Erpeldinger, Sylvie [1 ]
Rehman, Michaela B. [2 ]
Berkhout, Christophe [3 ]
Pigache, Christophe [1 ]
Zerbib, Yves [1 ,4 ]
Regnault, Francis [1 ]
Guerin, Emilie [1 ]
Supper, Irene [1 ]
Cornu, Catherine [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Kassai, Behrouz [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Gueyffier, Francois [5 ,7 ]
Boussageon, Remy [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, Univ Coll Gen Med, Lyon, France
[2] CHU Poitiers, Dept Cardiol, F-86000 Poitiers, France
[3] Univ Lille Nord France Lille 2, Dept Gen Med, Lille, France
[4] Univ Lyon 1, SCF SHS S2HEP, EA 4148, Lyon, France
[5] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Lyon, France
[6] INSERM CIC1407, Clin Invest Ctr, Lyon, France
[7] Hosp Civils Lyon, Clin Pharmacol & Clin Trials Dept, Lyon, France
[8] Univ Poitiers, Dept Gen Med, Poitiers, France
关键词
Meta-analysis; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Hypoglycaemic drugs; Insulin; Mortality; Morbidity; Randomised Controlled Trials; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA; GLARGINE; METFORMIN; MORTALITY; EXENATIDE; PEOPLE; RISK; SULFONYLUREA;
D O I
10.1186/s12902-016-0120-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: It is essential to anticipate and limit the social, economic and sanitary cost of type 2 diabetes (T2D), which is in constant progression worldwide. When blood glucose targets are not achieved with diet and lifestyle intervention, insulin is recommended whether or not the patient is already taking hypoglycaemic drugs. However, the benefit/risk balance of insulin remains controversial. Our aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of insulin vs. hypoglycaemic drugs or diet/placebo on clinically relevant endpoints. Methods: A systematic literature review (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library) including all randomised clinical trials (RCT) analysing insulin vs. hypoglycaemic drugs or diet/placebo, published between 1950 and 2013, was performed. We included all RCTs reporting effects on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, death by cancer, cardiovascular morbidity, microvascular complications and hypoglycaemia in adults >= 18 years with T2D. Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and extracted the data. Internal validity of studies was analyzed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated, using the fixed effect model in first approach. The I-2 statistic assessed heterogeneity. In case of statistical heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses then a random effect model were performed. The alpha threshold was 0.05. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were non-fatal cardiovascular events, hypoglycaemic events, death from cancer, and macro-or microvascular complications. Results: Twenty RCTs were included out of the 1632 initially identified studies. 18 599 patients were analysed: Insulin had no effect vs. hypoglycaemic drugs on all-cause mortality RR = 0.99 (95 % CI = 0.92-1.06) and cardiovascular mortality RR = 0.99 (95 % CI = 0.90-1.09), nor vs. diet/placebo RR = 0.92 (95 % CI = 0.80-1.07) and RR = 0.95 (95 % CI 0.77-1.18) respectively. No effect was found on secondary outcomes either. However, severe hypoglycaemia was more frequent with insulin compared to hypoglycaemic drugs RR = 1.70 (95 % CI = 1.51-1.91). Conclusions: There is no significant evidence of long term efficacy of insulin on any clinical outcome in T2D. However, there is a trend to clinically harmful adverse effects such as hypoglycaemia and weight gain. The only benefit could be limited to reducing short term hyperglycemia. This needs to be confirmed with further studies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Beneficial effects of insulin versus sulphonylurea on insulin secretion and metabolic control in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients [J].
Alvarsson, M ;
Sundkvist, G ;
Lager, I ;
Henricsson, M ;
Berntorp, K ;
Fernqvist-Forbes, E ;
Steen, L ;
Westermark, G ;
Westermark, P ;
Örn, T ;
Grill, V .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (08) :2231-2237
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Med Lett Drugs Ther, V14, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Diabetes, V31 Suppl 5, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEW ENGL J MED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1975, DIABETES, V24, P65, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTERNMED.2009.20
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NICE GUIDANCE
[7]   Insulin glargine versus sitagliptin in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on metformin (EASIE): a multicentre, randomised open-label trial [J].
Aschner, Pablo ;
Chan, Juliana ;
Owens, David R. ;
Picard, Sylvie ;
Wang, Edward ;
Dain, Marie-Paule ;
Pilorget, Valerie ;
Echtay, Akram ;
Fonseca, Vivian .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9833) :2262-2269
[8]   Insulin glargine provides greater improvements in glycaemic control vs. intensifying lifestyle management for people with type 2 diabetes treated with OADs and 7-8% A1c levels. The TULIP study [J].
Blickle, J. -F. ;
Hancu, N. ;
Piletic, M. ;
Profozic, V. ;
Shestakova, M. ;
Dain, M. -P. ;
Jacqueminet, S. ;
Grimaldi, A. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (04) :379-386
[9]   The association between symptomatic, severe hypoglycaemia and mortality in type 2 diabetes: retrospective epidemiological analysis of the ACCORD study [J].
Bonds, Denise E. ;
Miller, Michael E. ;
Bergenstal, Richard M. ;
Buse, John B. ;
Byington, Robert P. ;
Cutler, Jeff A. ;
Dudl, R. James ;
Ismail-Beigi, Faramarz ;
Kimel, Angela R. ;
Hoogwerf, Byron ;
Horowitz, Karen R. ;
Savage, Peter J. ;
Seaquist, Elizabeth R. ;
Simmons, Debra L. ;
Sivitz, William I. ;
Speril-Hillen, Joann M. ;
Sweeney, Mary Ellen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :137
[10]   Are concomitant treatments confounding factors in randomized controlled trials on intensive blood-glucose control in type 2 diabetes? a systematic review [J].
Boussageon, Remy ;
Supper, Irene ;
Erpeldinger, Sylvie ;
Cucherat, Michel ;
Bejan-Angoulvant, Theodora ;
Kassai, Behrouz ;
Cornu, Catherine ;
Gueyffier, Francois .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13