The impact of artifact removal approaches on TMS-EEG signal

被引:38
|
作者
Bertazzoli, Giacomo [1 ,2 ]
Esposito, Romina [1 ]
Mutanen, Tuomas P. [3 ]
Ferrari, Clarissa [4 ]
Ilmoniemi, Risto J. [3 ]
Miniussi, Carlo [1 ]
Bortoletto, Marta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Ctr Mind Brain Sci CIMeC, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Neurophysiol Lab, Via Pilastroni 4, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
[3] Aalto Univ, Dept Neurosci & Biomed Engn, Espoo, Finland
[4] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratell, Serv Stat, Brescia, Italy
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
TMS-EEG; Preprocessing; Reliability; TMS-evoked potentials; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; EVOKED EEG; RESPONSES; RELIABILITY; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118272
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) allow one to assess cortical excitability and effective connectivity in clinical and basic research. However, obtaining clean TEPs is challenging due to the various TMS-related artifacts that contaminate the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal when the TMS pulse is delivered. Different preprocessing approaches have been employed to remove the artifacts, but the degree of artifact reduction or signal distortion introduced in this phase of analysis is still unknown. Knowing and controlling this potential source of uncertainty will increase the inter-rater reliability of TEPs and improve the comparability between TMS-EEG studies. The goal of this study was to assess the variability in TEP waveforms due to of the use of different preprocessing pipelines. To accomplish this aim, we preprocessed the same TMS-EEG data with four different pipelines and compared the results. The dataset was obtained from 16 subjects in two identical recording sessions, each session consisting of both left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left inferior parietal lobule stimulation at 100% of the resting motor threshold. Considerable differences in TEP amplitudes and global mean field power (GMFP) were found between the preprocessing pipelines. Topographies of TEPs from the different pipelines were all highly correlated (rho>0.8) at latencies over 100 ms. By contrast, waveforms at latencies under 100 ms showed a variable level of correlation, with rho ranging between 0.2 and 0.9. Moreover, the test-retest reliability of TEPs depended on the preprocessing pipeline. Taken together, these results take us to suggest that the choice of the preprocessing approach has a marked impact on the final TEP, and that further studies are needed to understand advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TMS-EEG co-registration: On TMS-induced artifact
    Veniero, Domenica
    Bortoletto, Marta
    Miniussi, Carlo
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (07) : 1392 - 1399
  • [2] Comparison of Three ICA Algorithms for Ocular Artifact Removal from TMS-EEG Recordings
    Lyzhko, E.
    Hamid, L.
    Makhortykh, S.
    Moliadze, V.
    Siniatchkin, M.
    2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 1926 - 1929
  • [3] Perceptual and Physiological Consequences of Dark Adaptation: A TMS-EEG Study
    Zazio, Agnese
    Bortoletto, Marta
    Ruzzoli, Manuela
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Veniero, Domenica
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2019, 32 (05) : 773 - 782
  • [4] Source-based artifact-rejection techniques for TMS-EEG
    Mutanen, Tuomas P.
    Metsomaa, Johanna
    Makkonen, Matilda
    Varone, Giuseppe
    Marzetti, Laura
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2022, 382
  • [5] ARTIST: A fully automated artifact rejection algorithm for single-pulse TMS-EEG data
    Wu, Wei
    Keller, Corey J.
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    Longwell, Parker
    Shpigel, Emmanuel
    Rolle, Camarin E.
    Etkin, Amit
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2018, 39 (04) : 1607 - 1625
  • [6] Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Single and Paired Pulse TMS-EEG Responses
    de Goede, Annika A.
    Cumplido-Mayoral, Irene
    van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2020, 33 (04) : 425 - 437
  • [7] A TMS-EEG Pre-processing Parameters Tuning Study
    Bondi, Elena
    Pescuma, Viviana
    Massalha, Yara
    Pizzolante, Marta
    Chirico, Alice
    Schiena, Giandomenico
    Bianchi, Anna Maria
    Brambilla, Paolo
    Maggioni, Eleonora
    MEDICON 2023 AND CMBEBIH 2023, VOL 1, 2024, 93 : 172 - 179
  • [8] Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) current direction and pulse waveform on cortico-cortical connectivity: A registered report TMS-EEG study
    Guidali, Giacomo
    Zazio, Agnese
    Lucarelli, Delia
    Marcantoni, Eleonora
    Stango, Antonietta
    Barchiesi, Guido
    Bortoletto, Marta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (08) : 3785 - 3809
  • [9] TMS-EEG: CURRENT POSSIBILITIES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
    Poydasheva, A. G.
    Bakulin, I. S.
    Legostaeva, L. A.
    Suponeva, N. A.
    Piradov, M. A.
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 2019, 69 (03) : 267 - 279
  • [10] TMS-EEG: A technique that has come of age?
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (03) : 265 - 267