The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?

被引:104
|
作者
Furukawa, Yuichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Econ, 21st Century Ctr Excellence Program, Tokyo 1080073, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Business & Commerce, Minato Ku, Mitaka, Tokyo 1080073, Japan
关键词
intellectual property rights; endogenous growth; innovation; learning by doing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2007.01.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses a variety expansion model of endogenous growth to examine the effect of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection on economic growth in a closed economy. Most of the studies in the literature show that, in closed economies, enhancing the protection of IPR increases the expected duration of monopoly and the associated incentive to innovate. A large incentive to innovate enhances the growth rate. However, allowing for technological sophistication that is driven by the cumulative experience in producing a final good, enhanced protection can have a negative effect on growth by increasing the share of monopolized sectors. Because the scale of production falls as a result of monopoly pricing, the experience accumulation declines with stronger protection of IPR. As a result, stronger IPR decreases the productivity of the final sector, the associated demand for innovation, and economic growth. This paper shows that, if the latter dominates the former, IPR protection is not growth enhancing. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3644 / 3670
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endogenous growth and property rights over renewable resources
    Suphaphiphat, Nujin
    Peretto, Pietro F.
    Valente, Simone
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 76 : 125 - 151
  • [32] How Does Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affect National Pharmaceutical Expenditure? An Analysis of OECD Countries
    Jung, Youn
    Kwon, Soonman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2018, 48 (04): : 685 - 701
  • [33] Knowledge spillovers and intellectual property rights
    Samaniego, Roberto M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2013, 31 (01) : 50 - 63
  • [34] Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model
    Yang, GF
    Maskus, KE
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 53 (01) : 169 - 187
  • [35] PROTECTION OF HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: TWO RIGHTS IN CONFLICT
    Cecconi, Elisa
    INFORMACION FILOSOFICA-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE FILOSOFIA Y CIENCIAS HUMANAS, 2015, 12 (23): : 67 - +
  • [36] The triple damage calculation for the protection of intellectual property rights
    Mengual, Lorena Maria Arismendy
    REVISTA E-MERCATORIA, 2024, 23 (02) : 175 - 202
  • [37] DO STRONGER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS INDUCE MORE INNOVATIONS? A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS
    Yang, Chih-Hai
    Huang, Yi-Ju
    Lin, Hsuan-Yu
    HITOTSUBASHI JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 55 (02) : 167 - 188
  • [38] Intellectual property rights protection and total factor productivity
    Su, Zhongfeng
    Wang, Chenfeng
    Peng, Mike W.
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022, 31 (03)
  • [39] Intellectual Property Rights: Protection of Biotechnological Inventions in India
    Gomase V.
    Kemkar K.
    Potnis V.
    Recent Patents on Biotechnology, 2024, 18 (02) : 128 - 143
  • [40] Stronger and more just? Recent reforms of China's intellectual property rights system and their implications
    Huang, Can
    Cao, Cong
    Coreynen, Wim
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2024, 18 (03) : 210 - 223