Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis

被引:38
|
作者
Guidozzi, Nadia [1 ]
Wiggins, Tom [1 ]
Ahmed, Ahmed R. [1 ]
Hanna, George B. [1 ]
Markar, Sheraz R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
fundoplication; gastroesophageal reflux disease; magnetic sphincter augmentation; NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/dote/doz031
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been proposed as a less invasive, more appealing alternative intervention to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following MSA for GERD control in comparison with laparoscopic fundoplication. A systematic electronic search for articles was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for single-arm cohort studies or comparative studies (with fundoplication) evaluating the use of MSA. A random-effects meta-analysis for postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQOL), gas bloating, ability to belch, dysphagia, and reoperation was performed. The systematic review identified 6 comparative studies of MSA versus fundoplication and 13 single-cohort studies. Following MSA, only 13.2% required postoperative PPI therapy, 7.8% dilatation, 3.3% device removal or reoperation, and esophageal erosion was seen in 0.3%. There was no significant difference between the groups in requirement for postoperative PPI therapy (pooled odds ratio, POR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.40-2.95), GERD-HRQOL score (weighted mean difference, WMD= 0.34; 95%CI -0.70-1.37), dysphagia (POR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.57-1.55), and reoperation (POR = 1.23; 95%CI 0.26-5.8). However, when compared to fundoplicationMSA was associated with significantly less gas bloating (POR = 0.34; 95%CI 0.16-0.71) and a greater ability to belch (POR = 12.34; 95%CI 6.43-23.7). In conclusion, magnetic sphincter augmentation achieves good GERD symptomatic control similar to that of fundoplication, with the benefit of less gas bloating. The safety of MSA also appears acceptable with only 3.3% of patients requiring device removal. There is an urgent need for randomized data directly comparing fundoplication with MSA for the treatment of GERD to truly evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nadja Rickenbacher
    Thomas Kötter
    Michael M. Kochen
    Martin Scherer
    Eva Blozik
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 143 - 155
  • [42] Laparoscopic Anterior Versus Posterior Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Broeders, Joris A.
    Roks, David J.
    Ali, Usama Ahmed
    Draaisma, Werner A.
    Smout, Andre J.
    Hazebroek, Eric J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [43] Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Froiio, Caterina
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bona, Davide
    Bonavina, Luigi
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [44] Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD
    Richards, William O.
    McRae, Carly
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (11) : 1762 - 1767
  • [45] Complete Versus Partial Fundoplication in Children with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mauritz, F. A.
    Blomberg, B. A.
    Stellato, R. K.
    van der Zee, D. C.
    Siersema, P. D.
    van Herwaarden-Lindeboom, M. Y. A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (10) : 1883 - 1892
  • [46] Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Warren, Heather F.
    Louie, Brian E.
    Farivar, Alexander S.
    Wilshire, Candice
    Aye, Ralph W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [47] Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Warren, Heather F.
    Brown, Lisa M.
    Mihura, Matias
    Farivar, Alexander S.
    Aye, Ralph W.
    Louie, Brian E.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (01): : 405 - 412
  • [48] Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Heather F. Warren
    Lisa M. Brown
    Matias Mihura
    Alexander S. Farivar
    Ralph W. Aye
    Brian E. Louie
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 405 - 412
  • [49] Laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Erenoglu, C
    Miller, A
    Schirmer, B
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2003, 88 (04) : 219 - 225
  • [50] LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE - TOUPET PARTIAL FUNDOPLICATION VERSUS NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION
    MCKERNAN, JB
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (08): : 851 - 856