Mating frequencies of Africanized honey bees in the south western USA

被引:27
作者
Tarpy, David R. [1 ]
Caren, Joel R. [1 ]
Delaney, Deborah A. [1 ]
Sammataro, Diana [2 ]
Finley, Jennifer [2 ]
Loper, Gerald M. [2 ]
DeGrandi-Hoffman, Gloria [2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Entomol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Carl Hayden Bee Res Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
关键词
paternity analysis; genotyping; social insects; polyandry; microsatellites; Africanized honey bees; APIS-MELLIFERA L; EFFECTIVE PATERNITY; EXTREME POLYANDRY; GENETIC DIVERSITY; KIN SELECTION; EVOLUTION; QUEEN; DNA; COLONIES; HYMENOPTERA;
D O I
10.3896/IBRA.1.49.4.02
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Emerging evidence suggests that there are significant adaptive advantages conferred to genetically diverse honey bee colonies through multiple matings with queens. We determined the intracolony genetic diversity of Africanized honey bee (AHB) colonies from a feral population in the south western USA. A total of 1,253 worker offspring were genotyped from 20 feral colonies (all but three of African mitotype), four managed AHB, three managed European honey bee (EHB), and four control colonies (headed by EHB queens instrumentally inseminated with one, two, five, or ten drones, respectively) using eight microsatellite markers. The 17 feral AHB queens mated with an average of 20.0 +/- 6.53 (range 10 - 32) drones, resulting in effective paternity frequencies of 20.0 +/- 8.46 (range 10.56 - 37.53), which is one of the highest mating numbers recorded within the species. Though Africanized honey bee colonies are among the most genetically diverse Apts mellifera yet recorded, their queen mating frequencies are within the expected range of the species overall, including African honey bees in their native range. The factors responsible for these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 310
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
ADAMS J, 1977, GENETICS, V86, P583
[2]   Intra-colonial variability in the dance communication in honeybees (Apis mellifera) [J].
Arnold, G ;
Quenet, B ;
Papin, C ;
Masson, C ;
Kirchner, WH .
ETHOLOGY, 2002, 108 (09) :751-761
[3]  
BEYE M, 1994, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V81, P460
[4]   GENETIC RELATEDNESS IN HONEYBEES AS ESTABLISHED BY DNA FINGERPRINTING [J].
BLANCHETOT, A .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1991, 82 (05) :391-396
[5]   Kin selection versus sexual selection: Why the ends do not meet [J].
Boomsma, Jacobus J. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (16) :R673-R683
[6]   Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera [J].
Boomsma, JJ ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 351 (1342) :947-975
[7]  
Camazine S, 1998, AM BEE J, V138, P677
[8]   Patriline differences in emergency queen rearing in the honey bee, Apis mellifera [J].
Châline, N ;
Arnold, G ;
Papin, C ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
INSECTES SOCIAUX, 2003, 50 (03) :234-236
[9]  
Crozier R.H., 1996, Evolution of Social Insect Colonies, DOI [10.2307/3495984, DOI 10.2307/3495984]
[10]   Genetic Characterization of Commercial Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Populations in the United States by Using Mitochondrial and Microsatellite Markers [J].
Delaney, D. A. ;
Meixner, M. D. ;
Schiff, N. M. ;
Sheppard, W. S. .
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 102 (04) :666-673