Determinants of Environmental Efficiency of the EU Countries Using Two-Step DEA Approach

被引:25
作者
Lacko, Roman [1 ]
Hajduova, Zuzana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Bratislava, Fac Business Econ Seat Kosice, Dept Econ, Tajovskeho 13, Kosice 04130, Slovakia
[2] Univ Econ Bratislava, Fac Business Econ Seat Kosice, Dept Quantitat Methods, Tajovskeho 13, Kosice 04130, Slovakia
关键词
DEA; two-step; emissions; environmental efficiency; European Union; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; 2-STAGE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.3390/su10103525
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The article discusses the environmental efficiency of the countries of the European Union and its main objective is to verify models that could be used to explain changes in efficiency in selected countries and to add to the contributions of other authors. Two-step Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been used, which is a suitable method for verifying the statistical significance of environmental variables. Two DEA models-CCR and BCC-were used and efficiencies have undergone a double-bootstrap procedure. As input variables, three emission per capita indices were computed to single output GDP per capita. Three truncated regression models have been proposed. Results have shown that the model with drivers of climate change and variables connected to socio-economic factors is the most relevant and significant. There are common variables, whose improvement increases the efficiencies in all European Union countries, but there are also indices which have to be considered in individual/subgroup policies and implications, such as environmental taxes, waste management, resources productivity, and transport of goods management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   The economic and environmental efficiency assessment in EU cross-country: Evidence from DEA and quantile regression approach [J].
Moutinho, Victor ;
Madaleno, Mara ;
Robaina, Margarita .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 78 :85-97
[22]   Efficiency of packaging waste management in a European Union candidate country [J].
Mrkajic, Vladimir ;
Stanisavljevic, Nemanja ;
Wang, Xiaoming ;
Tomas, Lidija ;
Haro, Pedro .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 136 :130-141
[23]   Drivers of land use efficiency and trade embodied biomass use of Finland 2000-2010 [J].
Saikku, Laura ;
Mattila, Tuomas J. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 77 :348-356
[24]   Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs [J].
Shi, Guang-Ming ;
Bi, Jun ;
Wang, Jin-Nan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (10) :6172-6179
[25]   Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes [J].
Simar, Leopold ;
Wilson, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 136 (01) :31-64
[26]  
Soares TC., 2018, EconomiA, V19, P266, DOI [10.1016/j.econ.2017.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ECON.2017.06.001]
[27]   Drivers for energy efficiency: an empirical analysis of Norwegian manufacturing firms [J].
Solnordal, Mette Talseth ;
Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 :2802-2808
[28]   How significant is energy efficiency to mitigate CO2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries [J].
Tajudeen, Ibrahim A. ;
Wossink, Ada ;
Banerjee, Prasenjit .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 72 :200-221
[29]   An analysis of Spain's global and environmental efficiency from a European Union perspective [J].
Teresa Sanz-Diaz, Maria ;
Velasco-Morente, Francisco ;
Yniguez, Rocio ;
Diaz-Calleja, Emilio .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 104 :183-193
[30]   Case study evidence that direct regulation remains the main driver of industrial pollution avoidance and may benefit operational efficiency [J].
Testa, Francesco ;
Styles, David ;
Iraldo, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 21 (01) :1-10