Comparison of the color of natural teeth measured by a colorimeter and Shade Vision System

被引:29
作者
Cho, Byeong-Hoon
Lim, Yong-Kyu
Lee, Yong-Keun
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Dent Biomat Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Inst Dent Res, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Conservat Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Dept Orthodont, Grad Sch Clin Dent, Seoul 136701, South Korea
关键词
tooth color; colorimeter; Shade Vision System; color difference;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The objectives were to measure the difference in the color and color parameters of natural teeth measured by a tristimulus colorimeter (CM, used as a reference) and Shade Vision System (SV), and to determine the influence of color parameters on the color difference between the values measured by two instruments. Method. Color of 12 maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth was measured by CM and SV for 47 volunteers (number of teeth = 564). Color parameters such as CIE L-*, a(*) and b(*) values, chroma and hue angle measured by two instruments were compared. Chroma was calculated as C-ab(*)=(a(*2)+b(*2))(1/2) and hue angle was calculated as h(o) = arctan(b(*)/a(*)). The influence of color parameters measured by CM on the color difference (Delta E-ab(*)) between the values measured by two instruments was analyzed with multiple regression analysis (alpha = 0.01). Results. Mean Delta E-ab(*) value between the values measured by two instruments was 21.7 (+/- 3.7), and the mean difference in lightness (CIE L-*) and chroma was 16.2 (+/- 3.9) and 13.2 (+/- 3.0), respectively Difference in hue angle was high as 132.7 (+/- 53.3)degrees. Except for the hue angle, all the color parameters showed significant correlations and the coefficient of determination (r(2)) was in the range of 0.089-0.478. Based on multiple regression analysis, the standardized partial correlation coefficient (beta) of the included predictors for the color difference was -0.710 for CIE L-* and -0.300 for C-ab(*) (P < 0.01). Conclusion. All the color parameters showed significant but weak correlations except for hue angle. When lightness and chroma of teeth were high, color difference between the values measured by two instruments was small. Clinical accuracy of two instruments should be investigated further. (C) 2006 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1312
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Amaechi Bennett T, 2002, J Clin Dent, V13, P100
[2]   INFLUENCE OF WINDOW SIZE IN SMALL-WINDOW COLOR MEASUREMENT, PARTICULARLY OF TEETH [J].
BOLT, RA ;
TENBOSCH, JJ ;
COOPS, JC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (07) :1133-1142
[3]  
Brewer JD., 2004, Dent Clin N Am, V48, P341, DOI [10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004]
[4]  
*CIE, 1996, CIE PUB, V15, P35
[5]  
CRAIG RW, 2002, RESTORATIVE DENT MAT, P41
[6]   Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns [J].
Douglas, RD ;
Brewer, JD .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 79 (03) :254-260
[7]   REPEATABILITY OF A SPECIALLY DESIGNED INTRAORAL COLORIMETER [J].
GOLDSTEIN, GR ;
SCHMITT, GW .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1993, 69 (06) :616-619
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF APPEARANCE MATCH BY VISUAL OBSERVATION AND CLINICAL COLORIMETRY [J].
JOHNSTON, WM ;
KAO, EC .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (05) :819-822
[9]   Tooth colour: a review of the literature [J].
Joiner, A .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 :3-12
[10]  
KUEHNI RG, 1979, COLOR RES APPL, V4, P83